Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (890372)	9/28/2015 3:18:08 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574256

You did suggest that. You offered it as a reason we should believe the ocean heat content is increasing at an increasing rate. I said nothing of the sort, but it doesn't take a science mind to understand that the radiation from the sun is being absorbed by the ocean, does the temp of the GOM at Houston stay constant year round??? What happens to the sun's radiation? Right.. much is reflected back out to space, but it must travel through our atmosphere which has certain heat transfer properties. One of those properties is thermal conductivity which will be reduced if the atmosphere becomes less heat conductive as it would with increasing CO2 content..... I don't understand where you're coming from........are you trying to argue that ocean warming hasn't been shown to have occurred hence it isn't evidence for global warming....and grade school kid knows that the water he is swimming in gets warmer the longer the sun shines on it....