SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RMF who wrote (892014)10/7/2015 2:30:36 AM
From: i-node  Respond to of 1572719
 
Price elasticity for cigarettes has been estimated at around a 5% reduction in consumption for a 10% price increase, which is about half that for some other non essentials. While price increases undoubtedly contribute I do believe researchers have established that education programs have been significantly effective.

If you increased prices it would probably help but with 300 million guns in the country the reality is there is no way of doing that. You just can't reduce that supply enough to make any difference.

The problem is that the value of human lives has steadily declined, and people will murder others for a crack rock or bag of weed. It is absurd. I am a chronic viewer of The First 48, and those detectives are often disbelieving that lives are taken for such rinky dink reasons. The guns aren't the problem when the jerks will kill someone over 20 bucks.



To: RMF who wrote (892014)10/7/2015 11:00:21 AM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572719
 
>>Maybe we should jack up the price for a handgun to $3,000 and the price for an AR 15 to $10,000.<<

If nothing else, it would get the ammosexuals to embrace 'income inequality'!