SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Zenyatta Free Speech Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: WolverineTrader who wrote (4302)10/9/2015 10:40:47 AM
From: Darby  Respond to of 22811
 
I think your on to something. How many people are in your group WT? Are you on a day pass?



To: WolverineTrader who wrote (4302)10/9/2015 12:20:59 PM
From: hoov2 Recommendations

Recommended By
stuffbug
techsupport

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 22811
 
BigDough your students are in for some interesting times. It will be the first time in history where a group of people are implicated in an organized bashing attack on a company using several public forums with the intent to lower the share price so they can buy shares at reduced prices. Fortunately for the investigators, members of the group left a trail of irrefutable evidence of their misdeeds at Stockhouse and SiliconInvestor.
Can you say non sequitur?

So, let me get this straight. You believe that you can meet three tests, which you have described. 1. Organization, by which I take it you mean conspiracy. Good luck with that. Agreeing with somebody is not evidence for conspiracy. 2. Intent to lower the share price. Good luck with that one. The posts made had greater effect than did the delayed PEA, the poor metallurgy, poor management....3. Buy shares at reduced prices. Who bought shares?

The only thing that you have irrefutable proof of is that you are a doofus. Your suspicions, whether individually held, or arising from group-think, are not evidence of anything whatsoever, except for stupidity.

Lar



To: WolverineTrader who wrote (4302)10/9/2015 12:22:05 PM
From: the Chief  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 22811
 
So Wolverine are you one of the people that believe bashing is being right, and wrong is long?

Just curious, would you like to review the 27 things I have said and had 26 of them 100% right?
So if I understand this whole process correctly, if you say something that is negative, and it turns out to be right, then being negative over rules being right? Is that how you see it?
Do you need the list again for review?