Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (185596)	10/9/2015 12:20:54 PM
From: weatherguru	2 Recommendations Recommended By FJB tonto Respond to of 224748

Too bad they included precipitation in the same page. Madison got more rain in 1931. So lack of "moist" flow excuse from the Gulf doesn't cut it. But nice try. I'll give you a rec for responding with a dynamical reply :) I appreciate it. Speaking of "global" temperatures; here's a plot of average station coverage from 1921-1950. As been proved in the ClimateGate hack, data preceding 1950 are made up, especially for the southern hemisphere. Good coverage over the U.S. and Europe, but that's about it.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (185596)	10/9/2015 12:35:16 PM
From: DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck	2 Recommendations Recommended By FJB rayrohn Respond to of 224748

Studies. Bahahahahaha! Exactly who published these "studies" who provided the "science" ? Grant chasers. Give it up Ken

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (185596)	10/9/2015 3:30:57 PM
From: weatherguru	3 Recommendations Recommended By DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck FJB TideGlider Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224748

No worries, Kenny. You're showing raw data for Madison. Once it does through NOAA's adjustments, the warming will be there. If you look at NOAA's adjusted data for all the U.S. and subtract the raw data, you get the plot below. Even NOAA shows this on their web site (yet they won't update it post-2000...I wonder why). Where the difference is > 0, the data are adjusted to be warmer. So yes, the warming is man-made via adjustments. And as I already showed you, 95% of the data across Earth before 1950 are fabricated, too. It'll sink in one day, right? "It doesn’t matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn’t matter how smart you are. If it doesn’t agree with experiment, it’s wrong." – Richard P. Feynman