SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (893204)10/12/2015 12:22:26 PM
From: Wharf Rat1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Eric

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574420
 
" I read the important papers on the subject,"

Which ones?

"Each of the IPCC reports has been an absolute fraud"
Very big lie

" the peer review process in important scientific journals like Nature andScience have been shown to have been corrupted by a predetermination of scientific outcomes."

Ditto.

Data Source: NASA GISS - GHCN-v3 1880-09/2015 + SST: ERSST v4 1880-09/2015



To: i-node who wrote (893204)10/12/2015 7:07:20 PM
From: Alighieri  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574420
 
So, I decided to invest the time to become aware, and I did; I read the important papers on the subject, I followed carefully the arguments about it, and I formed the best opinion I can, which is that there is no real evidence of AGW at this time. That is not to say there is no AGW, just that there is no evidence of it.


I can just imagine what you are reading or whose opinion you are listening to...

Al


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News