Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (894376)	10/16/2015 6:02:44 PM
From: Brumar89	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576159

You are still unable to read or understand the article you posted: Of course, there’s no way to measure the true impact of Connecticut’s “permit-to-purchase” law. We can’t access the alternate universe where Connecticut’s law never existed. But we can compare Connecticut against the 39 states that didn’t have similar legislation at the time. That’s what the researchers did,..... the researchers tried to predict what Connecticut would have looked like without its “permit-to-purchase” law. Taking data from statistically similar states, they made a “synthetic” Connecticut ... If CT's gun crimes have gone down, it makes more sense to give the credit to CT being an open carry and concealed carry state. Concealed carrier kills Democratic thug in CT café: patriotupdate.com