Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael d kugler who wrote (29683)	12/23/1997 12:19:00 AM
From: Pugs	Respond to of 55532

<lol>!!! I don't know whats' funnier Kugler, how condescending your last post was, or this 'best behavior' act you're putting on for the SEC! So, are the RMIL MM's packin' it up Mike? Pugs

To: michael d kugler who wrote (29683)	12/23/1997 12:20:00 AM
From: DDuncan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

<Not all the posters here are rookies though. And the rookies hopefully have learned this lesson early enough to smell this kind of thing coming, in the future, and profit by it> All schooling cost money. This has been a very learning experience at the price of admission. Good night to all and to all a MERRY CHRISTMAS.

To: michael d kugler who wrote (29683)	12/23/1997 12:33:00 AM
From: slotman	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 55532

I think that all the nays who directly influenced RMIL shareholders to sell should get the credit they think they deserve. So I think I will conduct a poll. I think also it's fair to say that many former shareholders re-visit this thread regularly and in particular during events like today's. We should get a good sampling. The criteria is simple: (Maybe this will clear the air on who saved who) I'll keep an honest tally and post the results when I feel like it and I might tell the truth. All former shareholders of RMIL: Did you sell based on information provided by the nays and if yes, which one? Who is your favorite nay? I'll start first. I BOUGHT RMIL because of mike kugler's posting.

To: michael d kugler who wrote (29683)	12/23/1997 12:51:00 AM
From: cheese	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Hey All, Someone today lumped RMIL with TRGC. I post the following for several reasons: A. ALL hope is NOT lost...IMO. This is far from being over. Never give up but be realistic. What's needed here are facts. 2. Someone else talked about selling shares to their broker for a penny a share to get a '97 tax loss. This might be premature...IMO. III. Can't think of it right now. Here's a short short-term history of TRGC as best as I can decipher it: On 6 Nov 97, the SEC halted trading for 10 days on TRGC because, "The SEC said it imposed the halt because of questions raised about the accuracy and adequacy of publicly disseminated information concerning the value of Trinity's assets, results of its business operations and recent resignation of its auditors." As best as I can tell, TRGC traded for ~$2.50-2.75 prior to the announcement. When trading resumed on 20 Nov 97, TRGC traded on the pink sheets. The next 5 days, TRGC had price swings from $1.50-~3.00. (This is from folks that posted the quotes on SI). On Dec 8, the SEC charged the CEO with fraud (I think for issuing illegal shares). The priced dropped to .25-.50. Every investor must do what they think best but the above is an example of a stock that did not resume trading and pummle at the open. The CEO did get charged and that's why facts are needed here. I'm not saying RMIL folks are doing anything illegal at all. I, as well as everyone else, want to know what's going on. Cheese Still Holding :-) PS I remembered no. III above. I got tired of folks saying it's all over. It's not over yet. PPS I am not an expert. The above is MHO. I'll take any CONSTRUCTIVE critisism.