SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Land Shark who wrote (895056)10/19/2015 8:03:58 PM
From: locogringo  Respond to of 1574447
 
You guys are insufferable and Woods is a known misogynist.

You need to grow up and quit calling everybody names. BTW, nobody asked you about Canada, and nobody cares. HTH, but it's extremely doubtful.



To: Land Shark who wrote (895056)10/20/2015 10:58:42 AM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574447
 
Bernie equated communism and maternity leave. He thinks we should admire Communist China's family policies.

Bernie is the misogynist ... thinking women all fantasize about being gangraped. As are the Chinese family policies Bernie praises:

14 weeks of paid maternity leave in exchange for the following....

#1) ALL women of childbearing age are required to report to the assigned "family planning monitor" according to the dictates of which province she resides. The information on her menstrual cycles, pelvic exams & forced insertion of IUD's is reported in a database for the state.
#2) The state, therefore, has sovereignty over all matters relating to her womb. She is required, by law, to have ultrasounds on a periodic basis to determine the status of her IUD and if possible pregnancy.
#3) Many women are trafficked into prostitution because of the overwhelming, lopsided, stats of male vs. female population ratio. Since there exists far more males.
#4) Women are forced to abort up to the 9th month if they are found to have more than one child, or they face paying hefty fines.



To: Land Shark who wrote (895056)10/20/2015 11:59:19 AM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574447
 
Land Shark, YOU'RE poisoning coral reefs: Oops! It may not be ‘ocean acidification’ killing coral after all – common chemical found in sunscreen is poisonous to coral reefs
Anthony Watts / 21 mins ago October 20, 2015

From the AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY and the “settled science” department:

Sunscreen is proven toxic to coral reefs
Tel Aviv University researchers discover chemical found in most sunscreen lotions poses an existential threat to young corals



The daily use of sunscreen bearing an SPF of 15 or higher is widely acknowledged as essential to skin cancer prevention, not to mention skin damage associated with aging. Though this sunscreen may be very good for us, it may be very bad for the environment, a new Tel Aviv University study finds.

New research published in Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology finds that a common chemical in sunscreen lotions and other cosmetic products poses an existential threat — even in miniscule concentrations — to the planet’s corals and coral reefs. “The chemical, oxybenzone (benzophenone-3), is found in more than 3,500 sunscreen products worldwide. It pollutes coral reefs via swimmers who wear sunscreen or wastewater discharges from municipal sewage outfalls and coastal septic systems,” said Dr. Omri Bronstein of TAU’s Department of Zoology, one of the principal researchers.

The study was conducted by a team of marine scientists from TAU, including Prof. Yossi Loya, also of the Department of Zoology, the Haereticus Environmental Laboratory in Virginia, the National Aquarium (US), the US. National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, and other labs in the US.

A deadly day at the beach

A person spending the day at the beach might use between two to four ounces of sunblock if reapplied every two hours after swimming, towelling off, or sweating a significant amount. Multiply this by the number of swimmers in the water, and a serious risk to the environment emerges.

“Oxybenzone pollution predominantly occurs in swimming areas, but it also occurs on reefs 5-20 miles from the coastline as a result of submarine freshwater seeps that can be contaminated with sewage,” said Dr. Bronstein, who conducted exposure experiments on coral embryos at the Inter University Institute in Eilat together with Dr. Craig Downs of the Heretics Environmental Laboratories. “The chemical is highly toxic to juvenile corals. We found four major forms of toxicity associated with exposure of baby corals to this chemical.”

Forms of toxicity include coral bleaching, a phenomenon associated with high sea-surface temperature events like El Niño — and with global mass mortalities of coral reefs. The researchers found oxybenzone made the corals more susceptible to this bleaching at lower temperatures, rendering them less resilient to climate change. They also found that oxybenzone damaged the DNA of the corals, neutering their ability to reproduce and setting off a widespread decline in coral populations.

The study also pointed to oxybenzone as an “endocrine disruptor,” causing young coral to encase itself in its own skeleton, causing death. Lastly, the researchers saw evidence of gross deformities caused by oxybenzone — i.e., coral mouths that expand to five times their healthy, normal size.

It only takes a drop

“We found the lowest concentration to see a toxicity effect was 62 parts per trillion — equivalent to a drop of water in six and a half Olympic-sized swimming pools,” said Dr. Bronstein. The researchers found concentrations of oxybenzone in the US Virgin Islands to be 23 times higher than the minimum considered toxic to corals.

“Current concentrations of oxybenzone in these coral reef areas pose a significant ecological threat,” said Dr. Bronstein. “Although the use of sunscreen is recognized as important for protection from the harmful effects of sunlight, there are alternatives — including other chemical sunscreens, as well as wearing sun clothing on the beach and in the water.”

The researchers hope their study will draw awareness of the dangers posed by sunscreen to the marine environment and promote the alternative use of sun-protective swimwear.

###

From the University of Florida, who also produced a press release:

The researchers found that oxybenzone, a common UV-filtering compound, is in high concentrations in the waters around the more popular coral reefs in Hawaii, and the Caribbean. The chemical not only kills the coral, it causes DNA damage in adults and deforms the DNA in coral in the larval stage, making it unlikely they can develop properly. The highest concentrations of oxybenzone were found in reefs most popular with tourists.



In laboratory experiments, the team exposed coral larvae and cells of adult corals to increasing concentrations of oxybenzone. The research team discovered that oxybenzone deforms coral larvae by trapping them in their own skeleton, making then unable to float with currents and disperse.

Oxybenzone also caused coral bleaching, which is a prime cause of coral mortality worldwide. Corals bleach when they lose or expel the algae that normally live inside them, thus losing a valuable source of nutrition. In addition, coral larvae exposed to increasing oxybenzone concentrations suffered more DNA damage.

Cells from seven species of corals were killed by oxybenzone at concentrations similar to those detected in ocean water samples. Three of the species that the researchers tested are currently listed as threatened under the US Endangered Species Act.

The team concluded in the published paper that “Oxybenzone poses a hazard to coral reef conservation, and threatens the resiliency of coral reefs to climate change.”

They just had to throw in “climate change”, didn’t they?

Note: Within 10 minutes of publication, the University of Florida portion was added along with a link to the Journal.

wattsupwiththat.com

So Sharkie, when you climb on a jet carrying almost two rail cars of fossil fuel from the tar sands and fly off to the tropics where you smear sunscreen on your pasty white body and dive into the formerly pristine waters of a coral reef ..... you're actually poisoning the coral reef. Man, that is awful. You need to stop that it you have any concern for the earth. How do you live with yourself?

Did you know I've never used sunscreen. We don't even have any at our house.


.. oxybenzone’s chemical formula is C14H12O3, see right there EVIL CARBON.



To: Land Shark who wrote (895056)10/20/2015 12:17:55 PM
From: Brumar894 Recommendations

Recommended By
jlallen
locogringo
Tenchusatsu
work4ever

  Respond to of 1574447