Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (895063)	10/19/2015 10:20:44 PM
From: Metacomet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574848

..you can't make progress aginst mental illness they need psychiatric help

To: combjelly who wrote (895063)	10/20/2015 4:04:35 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	3 Recommendations Recommended By locogringo PKRBKR TideGlider Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574848

LOL CJ, you spent a lot of time in that post trying to split hairs, call out distinctions that make no difference, and exaggerate everything I said. But for the sake of not wasting too much time on your utter bullshit, I'll just answer this part of your post, which brings us back to the original Pentagon report: Your first outlandish statement was when you called the report about the Pentagon regards climate change as an imminent threat to national security as "a hoot". I showed how that was FOS, and that in fact, is an imminent threat because crop failures can lead to events with national security implications. I already pointed out that crop failures have happened before industrialization, before the climate started "changing" because of mankind. I also pointed out that industrialized societies have overcome crop failures with major advances in agriculture, and that whatever crop failures occur due to a "changing climate" are easily overcome by said industrialization. Third world nations are unable to overcome these crop failures with industrialization because of all of the conditions that put them into third world status. Oppression, lack of basic infrastructure, dysfunctional governments, fundamentalism, etc. These conditions have much more implications on national security than "climate change." Yet the left wants to grab onto a Pentagon report and magnify it for their own political agenda. They are desperate to conflate their environmentalism with national security because they need to exaggerate the threat of "climate change" in every way possible. Hence the ridiculous notion that climate change causes threats to our national security. Cause you know, if the climate didn't change, crop failures wouldn't happen, people would stop revolting, and terrorism would cease to exist. Everyone would hold hands and sing John Lennon's "Imagine" ... Tenchusatsu