SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Land Shark who wrote (895176)10/20/2015 1:52:11 PM
From: PKRBKR  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576336
 
Deniers say that current AGW is just part of a "natural" cycle. Today's rate of CO2 increase is 100x that of the exit from the last glacial period (and accelerating). This is not natural.

I'm a denier but don't argue with the cause of most of the CO2 increase. Since it is such a low level concentration in the atmosphere it would be impossible to explain the sort of fabricated hockey stick increase in temperatures. Now if it were on a comparable level to say water vapor than I would be on the bandwagon. Since the data has been manipulated it isn't possible to say whether or not there is warming. Even if there is it is due to sun activity or something similar.



To: Land Shark who wrote (895176)10/20/2015 2:11:24 PM
From: d[-_-]b  Respond to of 1576336
 
If CO2 had gone any lower - all life would die.