Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Osicom(FIBR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ploni who wrote (3708)	12/23/1997 10:29:00 AM
From: Grantcw	Respond to of 10479

Charles, "Don't give the Motley Fool's too much credit. Valuing a company in this way has been around a long, long time." I've heard that valuing growth stocks this way has been around for a long time, but I figured that would be the easiest way for people to respect the method as most people have heard of the Motley Fool. "Witz is no longer associated with the company, other than still being a shareholder. So whatever he is or was might not be relevant, especially if Par and other Osicom personnel were unaware of it." Yes, it's probably better from a fraud standpoint that Witz is not with the company anymore. There is probably only one remote problem we could have. If Witz or Par somehow emptied the company of its cash/assets through shady accounting techniques, we would be holding a shell. I don't think any article has claimed this might have happened, but the word fraud gets me uneasy. Most of the articles only related to mob action with the stock price, right? Grant