Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maverick who wrote (41328)	12/23/1997 9:03:00 AM
From: Sir Walter Scott	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

maverick, since you don't subscribe to Zack then what's your source for this IOM downgrade thingie? -sws

To: Maverick who wrote (41328)	12/23/1997 9:29:00 AM
From: Tom Gebing	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

Maverick - the court info is old news, but thanks. As for Zacks, as I recall, they don't make earnings estimates, they just rate based on the analysts recommendations. Therefore, someone mat have dropped their earnings estimate and Zacks restated the rating. This might be a temporary problem of which the earnings and followed CC should remedy. With the Asian thing, the market as a whole is not going to do much till the facts come out. That means earnings and future info from each company. Make your decisions based on fundamentals of the company, not what the hype and BS may be at any given time.

To: Maverick who wrote (41328)	12/23/1997 9:56:00 AM
From: KM	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 58324

Hi Maverick: I'm really not feeling too good today about IOM. I hate $12 stocks. Usually won't touch them. This is why I hated the split so much when it was announced. I also have a chart which doesn't look too swift at the moment, although that could change in a day's action. It implies new lows and will lead me to scale up sell into rallies here. It is bizarre how the landscape has altered so drastically in such a short time, but we were due. We sat up there hitting 52 week highs with tech corpses all around us. This situation is still one of the most frustrating ones I've been in in years. Why are there no buyers in this issue? I'd again like to hear any bull arguments anyone can make to alter my mindset. The way things are going, if Rocky is going to hang around up to 32, ya'll may have him around for awhile.