Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gronieel2 who wrote (896652)	10/27/2015 11:03:07 AM
From: combjelly	Respond to of 1573895

If so, then why didn’t Reagan’s spending increases and tax cuts produce faster growth than Clinton’s? Easy enough. Reagan's spending increases and tax cuts were mainly targeted at the investment class, unlike Clinton's. Which is great if there isn't enough investment. But there is a limit to quality investments. Now those who aren't in the investment class tend to spend and not invest any windfall. Given that our economy is driven by consumer spending and not investment, well do the math...

To: gronieel2 who wrote (896652)	10/27/2015 11:33:56 AM
From: Bonefish	2 Recommendations Recommended By FJB locogringo Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573895

Clinton ran a surplus during his last four years in office. . But doesn’t federal spending, like Reagan’s, stimulate the economy? If so, then why didn’t Reagan’s spending increases and tax cuts produce faster growth than Clinton’s? Answer. Newt Gingrich.

To: gronieel2 who wrote (896652)	10/27/2015 11:38:56 AM
From: locogringo	3 Recommendations Recommended By Brumar89 FJB jlallen Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573895

What's goin on here with all these kiss@$$ multiple posts, (all unattributed BTW). Did you join the email list of the democraticunderground at the food stamp counter or do they come in automatically on your freebie obamaphone? Geesh..............how borrrriing.