To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (896800 ) 10/27/2015 8:17:15 PM From: Brumar89 1 RecommendationRecommended By
Read Replies (1) | Respond to Black lung aka coal worker's pneumoconiosis and silicosis are very similar but they are caused by breathing different dust substances. Did you know the John L Lewis had the UMWA intentionally ignore black lung for a long time in order to keep production (and thus union welfare and pension fund contributions) high?Black lung is actually a set of conditions and until the 1950s its dangers were not well understood. The prevailing view was that silicosis was very serious but it was solely caused by silica and not coal dust. The miners' union, the United Mine Workers of America , realized that rapid mechanization meant drills that produced much more dust, but under John L. Lewis they decided not to raise the black lung issue because it might impede the mechanization that was producing higher productivity and higher wages. Union priorities were to maintain the viability of the long-fought-for welfare and retirement fund, and that required higher outputs of coal. After the death of Lewis, the union dropped its opposition to calling black lung a disease , and realized the financial advantages of a fund for its disabled members.In the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969 , the US Congress set up standards to reduce dust and created the Black Lung Disability Trust. The mining companies agreed to a clause, by which a ten-year history of mine work, coupled with X-ray or autopsy evidence of severe lung damage, guaranteed compensation. Equally important was a "rate retention" clause that allowed workers with progressive lung disease to transfer to jobs with lower exposure without loss of pay, seniority, or benefits. Financed by a federal tax on coal, the Trust by 2009 had distributed over $44 billion in benefits to miners disabled by the disease and their widows. A miner who spent 25 years in underground coal mines has a 5–10% risk of contracting the disease.
