Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Corporate Vision (CVIA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brad who wrote (1284)	12/23/1997 11:31:00 AM
From: Dusty	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6654

Brad, You may be right in your assessment of things in general but Why can you please tell me that there is no trace of Western Oil & Tire Dist. listed in Seattle or the surrounding area! I have spent money to access huge databases and have come up empty! Let me tell ya in this state (WA) if you are doing business someone in the this state knows it and has you in a database. Were we given the wrong name and location? Did the press messup? Is the name of the outfit indeed WOTD or did we all misunderstand and they are merely disclosing that it is an oil and tire related business. If so I appoligize. But, it appeared to be the name of a business, that was supposedly based in Seattle. That is the way I read it anyway. Are the investors being treated like mushrooms or did we jump to conclusions? If Jack Arnold does not give a straight up answer to this mystery something is not right. Dusty

To: Brad who wrote (1284)	12/23/1997 11:31:00 AM
From: dexx	Respond to of 6654

To all, I e-mailed CVIA and asked for a mailing address. They gave me the following: Corporate Vision, Inc. 6202 S. Lewis Ave., Suite A Tulsa, OK 74136 They also said they have added two CVIA phone lines. Ph: 918-747-2842 Fax: 918-748-9683 I think adding phone lines is a good sign that something positive is happening (IMO). This is one of the most informative threads on SI. There seems to be a lot of knowledge among the participants. I am learning a great deal. Thanks to all. Merry Christmas. Dexx

To: Brad who wrote (1284)	12/23/1997 11:54:00 AM
From: J.R.	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 6654

Hi, Brad: Thanks for your assessment of the situation. I emailed CVIA yesterday asking about when we will know the net assets of WOTD. As soon as I get a response, I will let you know. During the course of my telephone conversation, with Jack Arnold, I vividly remember him stating that this (WOTD) is a large private company. If this is so, then shouldn't the company have been around for some time to build to into a large entity? Or, maybe WOTD is just cash rich by having private investors infuse capital into it. Any thoughts to this? Assuming WOTD is a cash cow, do you think the funding will be primarily with cash or by issuing a lot of shares. As far as the conversion ratio is concerned, I certainly hope the company decides to increase the number of shares authorized, rather than implementing a reverse split. As you know, reverse splits have historically been terrible for the share price. Jack Arnold is a pharmacist and not a trader/speculator. I am not sure he is aware of how poorly stock prices perform after reverse splits. If he knew the possible ramifications of this, he may think long and hard before proposing or voting for a reverse split. Any thoughts on this as well? I know he has the shareholder's interests as his paramount concern, but is he aware of how stock prices tank as a result of the reverse split?