Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (897008)	10/28/2015 10:52:58 AM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574681

Fiji PM decries Australia's 'climate change deniers' in Turnbull cabinet Frank Bainimarama says: ‘The Australian government, in particular, seems intent on putting its own immediate economic interests first’ Wednesday 28 October 2015 05.00 EDT Last modified on Wednesday 28 October 2015 05.01 EDT The prime minister of Fiji has delivered a blistering broadside at his Australian counterpart, Malcolm Turnbull, over the “climate change deniers” in his government who are helping doom Australia’s “unlucky island neighbours”. Frank Bainimarama criticised Australia and New Zealand for failing to back Pacific island nations over climate change, claiming that the entire region risked being wiped out by rising sea levels, extreme weather and ruined agriculture. “The Australian government, in particular, seems intent on putting its own immediate economic interests first,” Bainimarama said in a speech delivered in Nadi, Fiji. “The ‘lucky country’ determined to stay lucky, at least for the short term, at the expense of its unlucky island neighbours. “To Malcolm Turnbull, the new Australian prime minister, I want to send a special plea. Make good on your previous strong stance in favour of deep and binding cuts in carbon emissions. Do not do deals with those who have enabled you to gain high office and betray your principles and our position.” Bainimarama said Turnbull should halt new coalmines in Australia and embrace an economy based on clean energy. Such a ban has been proposed by a coalition of Pacific nations in the recent Suva declaration. The Fijian prime minister said coal was “the dirtiest of energy sources. And there is no place for it in a world that desperately needs cleaner energy to halt the present rate of global warming. “I urge you, Mr Turnbull, to heed that call. And to side with us in the Pacific against the proponents of coal and the climate change deniers in your own government.” Turnbull has come under pressure on climate change after 61 prominent Australians signed a letter calling on world leaders to discuss a ban on new coal mines and mine expansions at upcoming UN climate talks in Paris. However, Turnbull, who lost the leadership of the Liberal party in 2009 over his support for an emissions trading scheme to combat climate change, dismissed the idea of a ban on Tuesday. “I don’t agree with the idea of a moratorium on exporting coal,” he said. “With great respect to the people who advocated it, it would make not the blindest bit of difference to global emissions. “If Australia stopped exporting coal, the countries to which we export it would buy it from somewhere else.” Australia has the highest per-capita carbon emissions of any industrialised country. It is also a leading exporter of coal and recently approved Adani’s $16.5bn Carmichael mine in Queensland, which will extract up to 60m tonnes of coal a year for export to India. The annual emissions from this coal will be higher than the entire carbon output of New Zealand. Bainimarama, who was speaking at a summit to address the impact of climate change upon health, said he was pessimistic about the Paris talks and lashed out at wealthy nations over actions he said were disastrous for Pacific nations. “Unless the world acts decisively in the coming weeks to begin addressing the greatest challenge of our age, then the Pacific, as we know it, is doomed,” he said. “Doomed to suffer the most negative impact of the rising temperatures caused by the carbon emissions that have accompanied the industrial age. Without having contributed to those emissions in any meaningful way at all. “In fact, we in the Pacific are innocent bystanders in the greatest act of folly of any age. The industrialised nations putting the welfare of the entire planet at risk so that their economic growth is assured and their citizens can continue to enjoy lives of comparative ease. All at the expense of those of us in low-lying areas of the Pacific and the rest of the world.” Bainimarama said he would be pressing other countries to agree to a limit of 1.5C warming on pre-industrial levels, rather than the current 2C target. He, and other Pacific nations, also want emissions cuts to be legally binding. Reductions already announced by countries would overshoot the 2C limit, according to recent analysis. The Fijian prime minister said the Pacific islands’ interests “are about to be sacrificed.” “This will happen even though the argument for urgent and decisive action is unassailable,” he said. “Three of our Pacific neighbours – Kiribati, Tuvalu and the Marshall Islands – are destined to physically sink beneath the waves altogether. Other nations will lose large tracts of arable coastal land. “And we will all be more vulnerable to the extreme weather events that already come out of nowhere, kill our people and ravage our economies. All because of the inaction and gross irresponsibility of what I have unashamedly called ‘the coalition of the selfish’.” theguardian.com

To: Brumar89 who wrote (897008)	10/29/2015 6:26:39 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574681

West Virginia Power Company Admits Coal Is Doomed by Natasha Geiling Oct 28, 2015 4:18pm On Tuesday, in front of a roomful of energy executives, the president of Appalachian Power declared that the war on coal was over, and coal had not emerged victorious. According to the Charleston Gazette-Mail, Charles Patton, president of Appalachian Power, told energy executives that coal consumption is likely to remain stagnant whether or not federal regulations like the Clean Power Plan are allowed to go forward. He also said that in the national debate about coal and climate change, the public has largely settled on the side of climate change. “You just can’t go with new coal [plants] at this point in time,” Patton reportedly said. “It is just not economically feasible to do so.” Regardless of how the Clean Power Plan — President Obama’s signature climate effort placing limits on carbon emissions from power plants — shakes out, Patton estimated that Appalachian Power’s use of coal could drop 26 percent by 2026. The Clean Power Plan was published in the Federal Register last Friday, and already faces more than 20 legal challenges from fossil fuel-producing states, utilities, and coal companies. It’s also being challenged by a group of Republican lawmakers who want to use the Congressional Review Act to essentially negate the rule. The Obama administration, as well as climate and environmental activists, seem confident that the rule will stand up in court. But even if it doesn’t, coal is still in perhaps terminal decline in the United States. That’s thanks, in large part, to a slew of other regulations that have cracked down on harmful pollutants like sulfur and mercury, as well as market forces such as the fracking boom that made natural gas cheap and widely available. For a lot of companies with aging coal plants, it’s better economic sense to retire those plants than incur the costs associated with retrofitting them to adhere to new standards, especially when natural gas is so cheap. “With or without the Clean Power Plan, the economics of alternatives to fossil-based fuels are making inroads in the utility plan,” Patton said. “Companies are making decisions today where they are moving away from coal-fired generation.” West Virginia is one of the states leading the legal challenges to the Clean Power Plan, and Patton said that he supports West Virginia’s lawsuit. West Virginia’s governor Earl Ray Tomblin (D) has said that the state will craft a plan in compliance with the rule while the legal challenges proceed. Coal-fired power plants are still the primary source of electricity in the United States, supplying the nation with 34 percent of its electricity. But that’s expected to decline in the near future, with the EPA expecting coal’s share to drop to around 30 percent by 2030. In fact, this July natural gas power generation exceeded coal for the second time ever, and this trend is expected to continue if gas prices remain this cheap. To counter the drop on domestic demand for coal, Patton urged the executives in the room to “think globally.” Around the world, coal remains a popular source of power. As Brad Plumer points out over at Vox, the rest of the world is undergoing something of a coal renaissance — there are currently more than 2,000 coal plants slated for construction around the world, with 557 actually under construction. To bring U.S. coal to overseas markets, especially markets in Asia where demand for coal remains high, several companies have proposed building coal export terminals on the West Coast. In Washington state, two proposals for coal export terminals that would ship millions of tons of coal overseas are currently under review. Coal companies are also eyeing a new shipping terminal in Oakland, slated to be finished in 2017, as a potential coal export site. thinkprogress.org