Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (897716)	10/31/2015 10:05:57 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574216

So, NOAA, a federal agency, understands that global warming is real? By what rationale does a federal agency have an opinion on global warming? This is the "official position" or it is the belief of 100% of employees of the department, or a simple majority, or what? Whar, exactly, does that mean?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (897716)	11/1/2015 1:37:43 PM
From: Brumar89	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574216

NOAA should just comply with his requests since they have nothing to hide, right.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (897716)	11/1/2015 1:44:18 PM
From: d[-_-]b	3 Recommendations Recommended By FJB i-node jlallen Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574216

The issue is the overreach of such demands from a congressional committee that clearly has no grasp of what it’s asking for, and is therefore grasping at straws. You're kidding right? A government funded agency claiming to have data to prove a position - yet refuses to release the publicly paid for research? You'd expect these guys would be falling over themselves to release all the data.