Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (897724)	10/31/2015 9:11:54 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574491

"I’m trying out some new ways to help people visualize how NASA data tampering has nearly doubled 1883-2003 warming since 2005, and how they made the hiatus disappear in 2015." Haven't he told enuf lies for one year? Drought swaying opinions on global warming Survey says 7 in 10 Americans believe there’s solid evidence By Ty Scholes, Cronkite News Published: October 30, 2015, 6:01 AM PHOENIX — Severe drought affecting many parts of the nation is convincing skeptics of global warming to reconsider their position on the matter. For the first time since 2008, 7 out of 10 Americans indicate that there is solid evidence of global warming, according to a report from the National Surveys on Energy and Environment. This is a 10 percent increase from last fall and just behind the record 72 percent in 2008. More than 60 percent of those who believe global warming evidence cite severe drought as having a “very large effect” on their stance. Dr. Nancy Selover, the state climatologist for Arizona, said there is good science supporting the public’s belief in global warming. “We’re seeing warming in different areas and in some cases we’re not necessarily seeing evidence of extreme events, but continuously warmer temperatures,” she said, adding that drought is not a good indicator of global warming. “We have cycles of drought that come and go. In the 20th century, we had a 37-year wet period that followed an extremely short dry 10 years … and now we’re in a 21-year dry period,” said Selover. Regardless of whether drought is proof of climate change, environmentalists are encouraged by the study’s finding of increased acceptance of global warming. “The misinformation that came out confused some people for a bit, but eventually people figured it out. A lot of that is due to good scientists getting that information out,” said Sandy Bahr, director of the Sierra Club Grand Canyon Chapter. “It’s hard to get action if people don’t think there is a problem. No matter what the problem is, you have to acknowledge that there is one. Then, the next step is to figure out the kinds of actions that we can take to address it,” said Bahr. The report also found: • 56 percent of Republicans believe there is solid evidence of global warming, up 9 percent from 2014. Seventy-nine percent of Democrats and 69 percent of independents believe in global warming. • Of those who believe in global warming, a record 65 percent say they are “very confident” in their belief. • Of those doubtful of global warming, a record 34 percent say local weather observation has “no effect” on their views. In previous surveys, “large majorities of Americans who do not believe there is evidence of global warming have pointed to local weather observations as the basis for their position.” Larky Hodges, who speaks to groups about climate change, related the issue to the tobacco industry. “You know how long it took people to understand that cigarettes cause cancer. And you know that was all a misinformation campaign. It’s the exact same problem,” he said. Hodges said the issue should transcend political affiliations. “If you see a flood coming down the road, you’re going to be sandbagging with all of your neighbors whether they’re Democrats or Republicans,” she said. “We should all be in this together and people just have to look past the partisan politics and say what’s best for me and my children.” columbian.com