SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Dubsky who wrote (1802)12/23/1997 11:35:00 AM
From: John Curtis  Respond to of 27311
 
Another resignation? What could it mean? It could mean just about anything. However, VLNC has taken it so heavily on the teeth from a share price decline standpoint that if a house-cleaning is truly going on in there, then this'd be the logical time to announce the shake-up(s). Could there be more to come? Who else could Mr. D. be looking to remove? Any old enemies from his former days with VLNC he'd like to toss? Politics, politics. And of course VLNC's stock is reacting according, bid $4 23/32 x $4 15/16.
However, this ain't such a bad drop, and it's holding up fairly well in light of this news combined with today's market, not to mention that the Korean market just fell out of bed "today." Oh, by the way, if anyone subscribes to the MM manipulation theory ya gotta expect that they've got a "basket" of VLNC goodies by now and so would be loathe to allow the price to decline very much. But that's just an idle musing. So given all the above, I subscribe to the "get all the bad news out now" theory. It means there's less likely to be an "interruption" in the stock price rise once production gets underway. Something VLNC still seems on target to accomplish. That's the only potentially bad news I'd not like to hear from them, ie. "eh......folks.....eh......we're having major troubles with the production line..." You just KNOW what would happen next, eh?

The long and short of it is VLNC is certainly guaranteeing a "spicy" set of Q/A at their next conference call, don't'cha think?

Regards!

John~



To: Paul Dubsky who wrote (1802)12/23/1997 12:22:00 PM
From: geep  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27311
 
Paul, I'm one guy who has the same agenda as you. I really enjoy
the hypothetical situations posted by all who participate. I hope
everyone would take them as just that (speculation). Keep the
posts coming . In the absence of official company information
this is the best game going. Thanks, geep