SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (898331)11/3/2015 3:32:22 PM
From: jlallen1 Recommendation

Recommended By
one_less

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574188
 
You are clueless as usual.....Carson never said the President can over-rule a USSC decision.....

"What the president and what the Supreme Court need to reiterate is that the states have a mechanism whereby they can determine the will of the people, it’s called ballot referendum. It has been done multiple times already, 32 states have indicated that marriage is between a man and a woman, and a few judges have come and overturned that. That, as far as I’m concerned, is unconstitutional, and Congress actually has oversight of all what they call the inferior courts, everything below the Supreme Court, and that’s where those overturns have come. And when judges do not carry out their duties in an appropriate way, our Congress actually has the right to reprimand or remove them. - See more at: rightwingwatch.org;

Why do you pinheads LIE so much?

Actually, I guess in your case its not a lie...you actually BELIEVE all the nonsense you post from your alternate reality....LOL!!

What a maroon!



To: combjelly who wrote (898331)11/3/2015 4:09:33 PM
From: Alighieri1 Recommendation

Recommended By
gronieel2

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574188
 
Like his ideas on the power of a president to over-rule a Supreme Court decision.

Right...that falls in the category of "crazy shit Ben says"...even ignorant republicans know that this is not possible, but he says it anyway.

Al



To: combjelly who wrote (898331)11/3/2015 9:04:20 PM
From: Don Hurst  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574188
 
Somebody has to ask Carson about his creationist beliefs and disbelief in the fact of evolution and then finish with asking him about the age of the earth...4000 or 6000 years old...and when he says 6000 years, we will find out how many of the right wing extremist science deniers on this thread and the base of the repugs want this guy anywhere near America's nuke arsenal.