SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : ZEN vs CCB -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RuddyMongoose who wrote (4968)11/4/2015 12:38:18 AM
From: RuddyMongoose1 Recommendation

Recommended By
WolverineTrader

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5988
 
Whatever could CEO Duncan have meant when he posted "I am taking back this board."

Does anybody else besides me think he actually controlled a public stock forum and he thought he was losing control to some posters he felt were not supportive of CCB so he posted that he intended to take back the board from those posters?



To: RuddyMongoose who wrote (4968)11/4/2015 9:39:01 AM
From: BigJohnDough1 Recommendation

Recommended By
WolverineTrader

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5988
 
Very interesting reading those flashbacks from the past RuddyMongoose.As you are aware we did a small project in class on all the 90 plus posts that were made.I can tell you spelling mistakes were a common theme.Not that its a big deal we all make them.In the second post a poster "high2" received the wrath of Mr Duncan.Our students never seen one post by that nick on the CCB board.We were puzzled and researched it more with the only result being chief and hoov disliked this poster from the ZEN stockhouse board.Appeared to be a connection that they used this against him.If we were wrong someone please advise but high2 never posted on CCB or ever mentioned them in libelous ways.Taking back the board and intimidating posters in no way associated to the CCB crossed the line of his\her right to post. But regardless those posts and most of the rest are priceless ammunition for any defense in Canada or the US



To: RuddyMongoose who wrote (4968)11/4/2015 12:20:09 PM
From: BigJohnDough  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5988
 
Spelling mistakes Ruddy it appears a rewrite should be in order.Thought I counted more than nine.I like when he is going to should it in chubbys face(shove) lol........I think he and hoov should rewrite all the 90 plus posts and repost retractions.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News