Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (114092)	11/4/2015 1:26:42 PM
From: Elroy Jetson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218633

Air crash investigations are far more transparent than you're imagining. Every time a local aviation authority releases a political conclusion to an investigation, the FAA and other agencies have also published the non-political version containing actual facts in rebuttal. This has happened a few times in the past. If it's true the passengers in the rear of the plane are all burned with shrapnel damage with the aircraft skin peeled outward, there was an internal explosion and no imaginary missile struck the aircraft. If residue from explosives remain negative, that narrows down the cause significantly, to a small range of explosives and the fuel tank.

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (114092)	11/4/2015 9:32:53 PM
From: Elroy Jetson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218633

British tourists tell of the man in the Sahrm el-Sheikh airport whisking passengers, willing to pay a fee, past the security line. How quaintly third world. Britain is correct to end flights to an airport run like a sieve. Nice to have Putin taking point on poking sticks into bee nests. As if that needed to be done.