Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (114107)	11/5/2015 1:11:15 PM
From: Elroy Jetson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218649

Your claim that ISIS shot down the jet is not supported by the evidence, would have required a highly trained crew operating a three truck missile system ISIS doesn't have, and is not supported by the satellite imagery. The Irish investigators along with the French who are investigating the crash of the Irish registered Russian jet will know what happened, certainly within the next 12 months. The Russian and Egyptians who are part of the investigation can choose to disagree with the conclusions, but that won't change anything. If the blabbed information about passenger injuries metal deformation is to be believed, there was an explosion inside the rear of the aircraft, caused by something they have not yet found. We also know that security at the Sharm e-Sheikh airport is abysmal - which hardly surprises anyone who has traveled much. So a bomb of some type being placed on the jet is not hard to believe. When they find what caused the explosion they will be able to say what happened. Until that time England is just guessing a being prudent.