SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Ask God -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: O'Hara who wrote (10203)12/23/1997 12:34:00 PM
From: Jane Hafker  Respond to of 39621
 
Good, that there is no problem whatsoever with a totally English Bible. I wonder where all of the stuff about Jesus comes from. THere is nothing of it I've seen that actually comes from the mouth of Jesus except through people who were mostly burned to death as quickly as possible. I'm not even vaguely using "black" humor here. Absolute truth.

I agree with Emile about the tiny little twisted truths in translations.
They can be used mightily and are. I disagree with this constantly coming back as a personal attack.

I see tares as every person and idea through that person who is used by satan in any way to bring people back to him, in idea form especially.

False doctrine is nothing more than a tare thinking it, and then somehow getting it into print to be taken down the road through history.

Could it be the "tare" concept has actuallly been taken too lightly, rather than looked at as the kingdom of evil surrounding us today?

Could be. Since Jesus is speaking of God first giving us the Garden of Eden, probably. And from there it became so horrible so quick He destroyed it all. Then immediately after that in scripture we see the entire known world worshipping satan outright in one grotesque idol representation or another. This is just history. Plain fact. That is the Ancient Mystery the tares of the Rennaisance revived. That the Ancient Mystery is that once pepople totally worshipped the mother goddess and their lives were spent in purely evil endeavors and they loved it. The Renaissance simply brought back the concept of seeking out the devil once again, and that through the door of aethiesm.

I'll look at tare tonight and see if I'm really off. I tend to feel we have greatly overlooked the effect of tares. But this not to disagree with you. I just see something in this struggle with Emile that reminds me of tares clearly for the first time, both in what he says and also in how he says it.