SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rocky Reid who wrote (41372)12/23/1997 12:15:00 PM
From: KM  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 58324
 
Rocky: If I shorted it, it would based on a complex technical pattern on the chart, similar to the sell signal given at 32-33, not any of bogus FUD frequently expounded here. Fundamentally, and if I were a long term investor type, IOM has an excellent story and future. I even considered exercising my calls in November but decided against it based on the chart. Once the technical pattern played itself out, I'd be a long buyer again. As a further disclaimer, the pattern I currently see could be violated easily by a upward movement of just a point or two on volume. So, don't count me in the IOM bear camp. I'm not.



To: Rocky Reid who wrote (41372)12/23/1997 12:15:00 PM
From: Gipper  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
THE FIRST PERSON WHO RESPONDS TO ROCKY GETS ZAPPED WITH
A LIFETIME SUPPLY OF JANET RENO PICTURES.



To: Rocky Reid who wrote (41372)12/23/1997 12:28:00 PM
From: cellhigh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
Rocky..if you dont mind,and if you hav'nt went over this before
i'm very curios why you went long.
i've been around the board as long as you,and it strikes me a bit
strange to see you long despite your longstanding bearishness.
surly theres a better short term play,if thats what your up to.
what gives??