Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pugs who wrote (29895)	12/23/1997 12:36:00 PM
From: Riley G	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

>Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 11:53:26, -0500 >Subject: input! > >I am completely amazed and befuddled as to why the nays are still >trying to get the longs to sell at the open, it looks like >desperation to me, if it is all over why don't they just take a walk >and let things take their course; but for some reason it appears >very important to them that they convince us to sell at the open. I >ask myself why, to drive the stock to zero, why zero, who gains if it >goes to zero, nays? Could it possibly be the short holders or am I >missing something? If it is all over go home, you have won and we >have lost. But I would bet my LIFE, that you will not go away and >let us mourn our loses, the nays not leaving us alone really has me >thinking, why are they still here, is there a lot more to this saga, >maybe we still have life, lots of life left, or they would be gone, >even if it wasn't the holiday season. I plan to hold on with 40,000 >shares, what have I got to loose, the nays say it is all over, so >according to them I stand to loose nothing further, so hold and >possibly buy more if the price drops to where the nays predict. Have >a prosperous and healthy holiday.

To: Pugs who wrote (29895)	12/23/1997 12:42:00 PM
From: tonto	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Pugs, the bloomberg 12-22-97 rmil release quotes Roland Breton. Roland said his firm, "had no idea" the SEC had questions of any of its public disclosures Looking back at the copious amounts of false and misleading statements made by the company regarding ownership of factories, factories in operation, garment contracts, refurbished vessel and Morgan reviewing it, no mention of eviction in Nicaragua,...how could a President of a publically traded company have "no idea"? This implies that during their meeting with the SEC no concerns of the SEC were mentioned that day during the course of the meeting. They were aware that the SEC monitors the net, the false and misleading statements are evident. Does anyone believe his statement? We have been advised the money is coming even with the cautionary advice of the SEC. The investor who has had difficulty coming up with the funds because of the asia affect, obviously is not flush, but this person is risking many millions anyways? That deposit will make this story great! That really would be great! We have been advised it will not be at the eleventh hour, any indication when the funds will be wired? The good thing is we only have this afternoon and tomorrow morning remaining, banks close at noon in most parts.

To: Pugs who wrote (29895)	12/23/1997 12:50:00 PM
From: Riley G	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

>Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 10:58:41 -0600 >Riley, > >In response to your request for input, I believe that the halt is troubling. But, that being said, I don't think it has to be fatal or even damaging in the end. > >Assuming the company is clean in all of this and hasn't lied to all of us about the float and also assuming that trading resumes, I think that we can still pull this off. > >Fundamentals- I think we all knew from calling the company that several statements made in past filings were wrong, misleading or inconsistent with Press Releases. For example, the boat, Ownership of facilities they actually were leasing, not telling us that basically they were currently not doing much if any business. These inconsistencies and possible lies have always troubled me, but I thought that if the SEC kept trading going, then the company must be clean. Especially since complaints from the nays came pouring in months ago. > >I believe that the company has been broke for some time, has not been able to pay bills or honor contracts, therefore they have had virtually no business. Because of the short selling the stock has tanked and they haven't been able to raise equity capital until this recent Asian placement and loan. > >If the Asian money arrives on time and they can upgrade the water facilities, fill back orders, restart their garment business, then maybe fundamentally they will be OK and a good long term investment. > >Aside from a few phone calls, I have no way of knowing if Morgan, Breton and Lori are telling the truth about any of this. They don't have a stellar past when it comes to being truthful, but I will withhold judgement until I get the facts from the 10-K and the SEC investigation. Therefore, I think we will have to wait & see if there is any Fundamental reason to stay in this stock. > >Squeeze- If your float numbers and your shares held in cert form numbers are accurate, then Fundamental analysis is irrelevant. If trading resumes and the numbers are correct, I think this halt may end up helping us. This provides 14 tradeless days to do nothing but bombard our brokers with cert requests. Also, hopefully, the SEC will either force an accounting of shares or at least press the TA to immediately honor our cert requests. Thus, if trading resumes, the squeeze may begin at the open and those who persevere will profit. > >That is my read on the situation. Therefore, I am not elated at the current situation, but I am cautiously optimistic that we can still prevail. > >All of my partially informed analysis aside, I still own close to 50K shares of this stock and I have no intention of selling for a loss. I knew that this was a sketchy investment from the start, but I committed to myself that I would either lose everything or make a hefty profit. This is high risk capital that I am using and thus I won't be crushed if RMIL becomes worthless. > >So, as long as neither the SEC nor the 10-K shows a substantial difference in float and assuming we reopen for trading on the 7th, I intend to buy at the open. I think if we all ban together and buy even a small amount of shares each, we can't be beaten. We control the stock, we hopefully own nearly the entire float, therefore if we buy & don't sell, the price can't decline substantially. If the certs keep rolling in then we should all have an extremely happy new year. > >Bottom line, I've never sold a share of RMIL and won't as long as the squeeze remains possible and/ or the Fundamental picture becomes positive. > >You haven't returned any of my last 5 e mails, I hope you will please respond to this one. Provide me with your analysis, clear up any errors in my thinking or my facts and answer the following question- > > Do any restricted shares lose their restriction and become part of the float within the next few > months? If so, how many? I have no idea what Rule 144 are coming off of restriction and when. If EVERY one has been truthful in their reporting to me, then we are very close to a short squeeze! I only count what is reported to me, and have keep all emails stating everyone reported amounts owned and called! Everyone needs to take this time to HOUND their brokers with the letters for RMIL stock certificate delivery and also notify the NASD and SEC that the brokerage firms are delaying or denying your shares in RMIL Name FORM! Riley G