SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Snowshoe who wrote (114132)11/8/2015 6:07:24 PM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation

Recommended By
dvdw©

  Respond to of 217557
 
<<downright scary>>

... why do you think so?

IMO,

(1) the south china sea certainly features a lot of islands, atolls, reefs, and features that appear and disappear depending on a host of affects, natural and a-natural and artificial

(1-i) the islands, natural and progressively enhanced, are claimed, occupied, enhanced, and gradually a-civilianized by many actors, all having done what every other did in enhancing islands and a-civilianizing same

notably china is most-late-joiner to the game of building islands





(note: unclear to me why "china's naval expansion raising tension w/ the u.s." for either (i) the u.s. is welcome to expand right along by quintupling, or (ii) shrink what is too big by 80%, as china is merely returning to where the state left off circa 1421 time of admiral zheng he when his sponsoring son of heaven led 35% of global gdp)

(1-ii) neither the islands nor the conflicting claims are going anywhere anytime soon if ever

(1-iii) the islands do not have natural populations but do involve migrated folks, many of whom are girls w/ modicum of doubtless talents

(1-iv) the islands' waters are patrolled by civilian coast guards of several domains

(1-v) as and whenever any party w/i and from outside of the region chooses to inject military naval aviation into the otherwise tranquil-enough neighbourhoods as compared to many neighbourhoods, am sure all nations would execute same injections into the neighbourhood

(1-vi) and when once so, am sure it then comes down to positional chess play, overarching principles, and layering of many considerations, amongst which would undoubtedly be ...

(1-vii) the conflicting claims had been in place for a long time, and shall remain until peaceful resolution or until any state decides it can no longer engage in the gaming as scripted before best-use-by date passes for its wherewithal

My guidance to all players,

(2) build bulk that can matter

(2-i) develop economy

(2-ii) progress geopolitical and economic weights

(2-iii) develop full-spectrum military capabilities, ideally high-ground dominating (these days mean space-dominating integrated planetary defence), involving 1-hr hypersonic global precision nuclear as well as conventional strike capability and capacity, in volume, at low cost, ...

(2-iv) offer co-development of whatever economic activities the conflict region can support w/ neighbours w/ conflicting claims, and circumvent the intransigent regimes by offering same opportunities to their democratic oppositions in every election

(2-v) advise against any protocol that seem to complicate but is otherwise foolishly ineffectual to move any meaningful dial as such actions would merely highlight impotence of the actor on the equation for all to see and would have only a lamenting giggle factor

(2-vi) am sure the conflicting claims shall resolve as motives waver, confidences hesitate, economies hiccup, and competing claims inevitably dissolve with the gentle passage of inexorable time

of all the possible issues in the world, a few insignificant islands cannot matter to anyone w/o any points, and the points shall trend toward pointlessness

but of course there is a key point, that being defence budgets and budget cuts and allocation of defence budget cuts. we leave that point to increasingly stressed and stressing needs to balance budgets

Some pics

i suppose if one were small-minded one could engineer a relocation of a certain fujian province family temple to any one of the many islands or to irrevocably disperse the temple to many islands to make some point, but i doubt such would happen as the conflict is for big-minded people given that the small minds shall undoubted drop away philstar.com
"... FUJIAN PROVINCE, China – It was a happy homecoming for President Aquino as he arrived in Hongjian village here yesterday to pay tribute to his maternal ancestors and follow in the footsteps of his late mother, former President Corazon “Cory” Cojuangco-Aquino ..."



girls girls girls, seashore, gardens, and more girls





girls and guns, would make a good magazine cover



Re <<freedom noodles>>

Had it not been the insignificant islands of south china sea, it would have been some other equally insignificant issue(s) to tee-up the inevitable freedom noodles protocol, as we cannot expect anything more or less, surely

the electorates are about to choose their next leader from amongst carson, trump and clinton. they shall do their very best in choosing, and live with the best choice for the 2017 - 2020 duration, and w/ luck for either the electorates or the chosen, maybe even for 2017 - 2024.

i of course expect much resolutions during 2017 - 2024 and during the overlapping 2018 - 2026, as i had stated enough times on this si thread

exciting period ahead, 2016 - 2026

Message 30302778

Message 29152659



To: Snowshoe who wrote (114132)11/12/2015 5:13:12 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217557
 
hilarity

under the circumstances of nothing-doing / nothing-happening innocent passage / peaceful rise, let us see if any other claimant or on-lookers try to challenge anything they may not like to lump

http://thehill.com/policy/defense/259958-us-flies-b-52-bombers-near-islands-claimed-by-china



US flies B-52 bombers near disputed islands claimed by ChinaThe United States flew two B-52 bombers over the weekend near man-made islands constructed by China in the South China Sea, a U.S. official told The Hill, in a clear challenge to China’s territorial claims to the area.

The bombers made one pass within 12 nautical miles of the islands, the official said, in what the military refers to as a "freedom of navigation" operation.

During the operation, the Chinese military radioed the bombers, telling them to "get away from our islands." The bombers did not comply, according to the U.S. official. The Pentagon released its own account of the flights after The Hill's report was published.

Pentagon spokesman Navy Cmdr. Bill Urban said two B-52s took off and returned to Guam on Nov. 8 and 9 respectively, flying a "routine mission in international airspace in the vicinity of the Spratly Island of the Spratly Islands in the South China Sea."

Urban confirmed that the pilots received two verbal warnings from a Chinese ground controller "despite never venturing within 15 nautical miles of any feature," he said. "Both aircraft continued their mission without incident, and at all times operated fully in accordance with international law."

The U.S. flights came after China recently placed advanced J-11 fighter aircraft on Woody Island, which is one of five artificially constructed landmasses in the area.

Experts say the deployment of the J-11 jets is a signal that China is prepared to protect its territorial claims to their man-made islands in the Spratly Island archipelago, which is made up hundreds of reefs, islets, atolls, cays and islands. Parts of the archipelago are also claimed by Brunei, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan and Vietnam.

China first began building islands on top of partially submerged reefs about two years ago, but has become increasingly assertive in claiming ownership of the area. Its officials have requested that ships provide prior notification to Chinese authorities when sailing within 12 nautical miles of what it claims is its territory.

The U.S. bomber flights took place after Defense Secretary Ashton Carter visited the region last week, although they were planned long in advance, the U.S. official said.

The flights also took place a little more than a week after the U.S. sent the guided-missile destroyer USS Lassen within 12 nautical miles of Subi Reef, one of China's claimed artificial islands in the South China Sea, on Oct. 27, which prompted outrage from China.

Some experts argue the USS Lassen operation sent mixed messages, since it was conducted in the manner of an "innocent passage" — when a ship takes measures to convey it is innocently passing through waters belonging to another nation — that would tacitly affirm China's claims.

Pentagon officials have pushed back against the notion it was an "innocent passage," though an official confirmed to Reuters that the Lassen turned off its fire control radars while transiting past Subi Reef, avoiding any military operations during that time.

Top U.S. officials were also hesitant to confirm the Lassen's sail-by in public, drawing fierce criticism from members of Congress who argued it made no sense to keep the operation private if it was meant to be a public demonstration against China's claims.

On Monday, Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John McCain (R-Ariz.) sent a letter to Carter urging the Pentagon to "publicly clarify, to the greatest extent possible, the legal intent behind this operation and any future operations of a similar nature."

“Given the sensitive political dynamics and detailed legal implications of our actions, it is vital that there be no misunderstanding about our objectives in either the Asia-Pacific region or within the international community," McCain wrote in the letter, published online by the U.S. Naval Institute.

While the bomber flights are unmistakably a challenge to China's claims, U.S. officials appear to want to keep such operations quiet, perhaps due to political sensitivities with China.

The U.S. wants to maintain a peaceful and productive relationship with China as it "rebalances" to the Asia-Pacific and works on a number of issues ranging from economic cooperation to climate change to cyber security.

At his first stop after leaving the region, Carter spoke openly about the United States' intentions to conduct more freedom of navigation operations, without delving into specifics.

"We will continue to fly, sail and operate wherever international law allows," he said on Saturday in California at the Reagan National Defense Forum. "It's important to remember that America's rebalance and this regional security architecture has never aimed to hold any nation back or push any country down.

"The United States wants every nation to have an opportunity to rise, because it's good for the region and good for all our countries. And that includes China. We welcome its rise, and its inclusion in this architecture; but it must uphold [China's] President Xi [Jinping]'s pledge not to 'pursue militarization' in the South China Sea," he added.

China's increasingly aggressive territorial claims have inflamed critics of President Obama's foreign policy, who say the U.S. is not doing enough to contest them.

While Obama visited Alaska in September, a flotilla of five Chinese ships came within 12 nautical miles of U.S. territorial waters. Pentagon officials called the incident an "innocent passage."

Republican presidential candidate Gov. Chris Christie (R-N.J.) criticized the White House's response to China's maritime territorial claims during this week’s debate.

"I will tell you this, they're building these artificial islands in the South China Sea and the president won't — up until recently, wouldn't sail a ship within 12 miles or fly a plane over it," Christie said.

"I'll tell you this, the first thing I'll do with the Chinese is I'll throw — I'll fly Air Force One over those islands. They'll know we mean business."

— This story was updated at 5:13 p.m.



To: Snowshoe who wrote (114132)11/12/2015 5:42:46 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217557
 
on freedom island we care about stuff like below that generate heated discussions

have been at a few meetings where otherwise very serious and consequential discussions are interrupted by the tea ladies serving tea on schedule. as the cheongsam-girls go around the meeting room refilling cups, whomever was just talking simply stops as no one would be listening in any case

scmp.com
The cheongsam, from swinging Shanghai to Suzie Wong to slit thigh-high

Introduced by the ruling Manchus during the Qing dynasty, the cheongsam (or qipao) is today one of the most recognised Chinese dress styles.

The first cheongsams were loose and covered almost the entire body, and the modern version dates from 1920s Shanghai. The influence of Western fashion at that time saw the cheongsam get shorter, sexier and more revealing of the wearer’s figure. Tailored tight to the body, it became the form-fitting design we know today.

SEE ALSO: The World of Suzie Wong, 55 years on: archives opened to revisit 1960s Hong Kong’s main eventThe new style quickly caught on with the upper classes, and became standard wear for Chinese women in the years that followed. In China, it took the Cultural Revolution and the Mao suit to bring its reign to a shuddering halt.


Beyond China, hit 1960 film The World of Suzie Wong, with its sexy lead character, played by Nancy Kwan, thrust the modern cheongsam into popular consciousness. The form-fitting versions, slit dangerously high, that Kwan wore on screen inspired copies worldwide, and still to this day provide a reference point for some of fashion’s biggest designers –– Hong Kong’s Shanghai Tang has been a faithful supporter of the cheongsam. Among the fashion houses to have featured cheongsams in their recent collections are Ralph Lauren (2011), Gucci (2012), Louis Vuitton (2011) and Emilio Pucci (2013).

Of the Hong Kong tailors making cheongsams, Linva Tailors in Central district have been turningn them out since the 1960s. Linva made cheongsams for the Hong Kong film In The Mood For Love (see below). Master tailor Leung Ching-wah took up an apprenticeship when he was 12. “There’s no point in making a cheongsam if it’s not made in the most traditional way, no point in making it if it’s not beautiful,” Leung said.

“In the 1950s and ’60s everyone wore a cheongsam, but after the 1970s, when the Western influence kicked in, they became unpopular,” he said.



In The Mood for CheongsamIn the 2000 film In The Mood For Love,directed by Wong Kar-wai and starring Maggie Cheung Man-yuk and Tony Leung Chiu-wai, the cheongsam – beautifully wrapped around Cheung’s figure – is almost a character in the film. Cheung wears 21 different designs, from bright florals to cool geometrics, each one complementing the backdrop of the scene.

Put another cheongsam on the Barbie
Love her or hate her, Barbie – the blonde-haired, blue-eyed plastic doll with the unrealistic body image – has been adored by young girls around the globe for decades. In 1998, Barbie’s creator, Mattel, released its Golden Qi-Pao Barbie doll to commemorate the first anniversary of Hong Kong’s return to Chinese sovereignty. The doll’s dress features layers of lace appliqué on a solid golden background. Tiny rhinestones and golden rosettes add to the bling factor. Fake crystal droplet earrings and a faux jade bracelet and jade butterfly complete her ensemble.


Kick-ass dress

In the popular Chinese Street Fighter video game, Chun-Li is recognised by her signature blue cheongsam (first seen in Street Fighter II: The World Warrior). To allow her to better kick and jump, her dress was modified to permit a wider range of movement. It is worn with white knee-high boots, hair bun covers, and oversized spiked bracelets.



To: Snowshoe who wrote (114132)11/12/2015 6:15:12 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217557
 
"oh cr@p", as jack (5) recently noted when told that one of his imaginary space cruisers got blown up while he and the landing party were on the planet exploring (i tell jack an unending series of made-up stories collectively called "space trek")

now look what john maccain is single handedly responsible for - militarisation of atolls, rocks, containers, and fishing boats, and note the choice of (highlighted) words by the usually suspect media

like, yeah, all the islands china administrates over in south china sea are somehow artificial, and only such are built by china

cannot blame the indians for trying and trying diligently

would imagine interested parties in a lot of other domains are spinning same sort of fiction

good that, whatever the spin, the islands are not moving, and neither are the girls protecting the islands

economictimes.indiatimes.com

China flaunts cruise missile power amid South China Sea rowBEIJING: Amid deepening row with the US over disputed South China Sea where American ships challenged China's claims of sovereignty, Chinese military has deployed its latest anti-ship cruise missiles which experts say can form a powerful defence line at sea.

"The deployment of the latest YJ-18, together with the YJ-12 and YJ-100, has enabled the Navy to deter any foreign navies from approaching its defence areas," state-run China Daily quoted unnamed strategy researcher in the People's Liberation Army (PLA) as saying.

"Few countries have developed advanced anti-ship missiles over the past decade as China has done," he said.

Yin Zhuo, director of the PLA Navy's Expert Consultation Committee, told China Central Television that no one has succeeded in intercepting a sea-skimming missile even if it is flying at a subsonic speed, so taking down a missile flying at Mach 3 will be very difficult.

"Compared with anti-ship ballistic missiles, the YJ-18 and YJ-12 will prove to be more useful, because even though ballistic missiles have a longer range and larger destructive power, their launch preparations are more complicated and their use is more likely to escalate a conflict," the researcher was quoted as saying by the report.

By contrast, anti-ship cruise missiles like the YJ-18 are easy to use and more defensive in nature, the researcher said, adding that China has become one of the top developers of anti-ship cruise missiles in the world.

Cui Yiliang, editor-in-chief of Modern Ships magazine, said the YJ-18 represents the development trend of next-generation anti-ship cruise missile.

It has high intelligence and good flight control and can perform sophisticated manoeuvres to avoid detection and interception.

Their remarks came in the backdrop of recent stand-offs between Chinese and American navies as a US warship sailed past artificial islands built by China in the South Chia Sea where Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei and Taiwan have over lapping claims.

The China Daily also highlighted the Washington-based US-China Economic and Security Review Commission in October about the China's missiles which has a cruise speed of 966 km/h throughout most of its 540-km range.

When it is about 37 km from its target, the warhead will accelerate to a superfast speed of up to Mach 3, or three times the speed of sound.

"The YJ-18's supersonic speed and long range, as well as its wide deployment on PLA Navy platforms, could have serious implications for the ability of US Navy surface ships to operate freely in the Western Pacific in a contingency," the report said.



To: Snowshoe who wrote (114132)4/29/2019 9:13:24 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217557
 
re <<freedom noodles>>
... probably goes well w/ fonop protocol, ordinarily, but team usa navy just issued warning that it would attack team china civilian boats as if they were military boats

... likely big talk and all talk, as in blah blah blah, even as the team china civilian boats are only armed against pirates, which, I suppose, under the circumstance is appropriate

bolton invoked the Monroe doctrine, that which cowed latin america, because the bull taunters also talk big but actually walk crooked due to ramming of balls

yes, today is an easy day even as there is plenty to day, because tomorrow is a public holiday, Labour day, which means we get to work from home without feeling guilty

below cartoon done by jack senior dated 1958.09.16 - how times change and 61 years passes quickly in context of 6100 years, even as diplomacy protocols do not


cnbc.com

US reportedly warns China over hostile non-naval vessels in South China Sea

Shirley TayPublished Mon, Apr 29 2019 • 2:00 AM EDT

This aerial photo taken on January 2, 2017 shows a Chinese navy formation, including the aircraft carrier Liaoning (C), during military drills in the South China Sea.
STR | AFP | Getty Images

The head of the U.S. Navy has warned China that hostile behavior from its coast guard and fishing boats will not be treated any differently from the Chinese navy, the Financial Times reported on Sunday.

In an interview with the FT, Admiral John Richardson said he told Chinese vice-admiral Shen Jinlong in January that Washington will respond to aggressive acts by these non-naval ships the same way it has with the People’s Liberation Army Navy.

That’s because non-naval ships have been used to help Beijing stake its claims in the disputed South China Sea, the London-based newspaper reported Richardson as saying.

“I made it very clear that the U.S. navy will not be coerced and will continue to conduct routine and lawful operations around the world,” Richardson told the newspaper.

The warning from the U.S. Navy comes as China increasingly relies on its coast guard and maritime militia — or marine industry workers trained alongside its navy — to expand its military presence in the region.

According to a 2018 report from The Pentagon, Beijing’s maritime militia is the only one in the world that has been sanctioned by the government, and it “plays a major role in coercive activities to achieve China’s political goals without fighting.”

The non-navy vessels have reportedly chased and fired water cannons at fishing vessels from Vietnam and the Philippines.

China has disputed territorial claims in the South China Sea with Vietnam, Taiwan, Malaysia, the Philippines and Brunei. While the conflict remains unresolved, the waterway has come up as a flash point in U.S.-China relations in recent years.

On Sunday, the U.S. military said that two of its navy warships sailed through the Taiwan Strait — which separates mainland China from the island of Taiwan, Reuters reported. Beijing regards Taiwan as a renegade province under its One China Policy, and opposes other countries pursuing diplomatic relations with the self-ruled island.

The U.S. Navy and the People’s Liberation Army Navy did not immediately respond to CNBC requests for comment.

Read more about Washington’s response to non-naval Chinese vessels in the South China Sea in the Financial Times’ report.




To: Snowshoe who wrote (114132)7/21/2024 2:38:07 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217557
 
Re <<this brinkmanship in the South China Sea is downright scary. I'm so sorry but if it continues there's a very real danger that the US Congress will go berserk and...

rename the Chinese noodles in its cafeteria to Freedom noodles!
>>

... following up to Message 30309307
the electorates are about to choose their next leader from amongst (Kamala) carson, trump and (Obama ... etc etc) clinton. they shall do their very best in choosing, and live with the best choice for the (2025 - 2028) 2017 - 2020 duration, and w/ luck for either the electorates or the chosen, maybe even for (2029 - 2036) 2017 - 2024.
...
exciting period ahead, (2025 - 2028) 2016 - 2026
... time to recycle old postings from back 2015 for forward use.

Both USA and China change much since that time, but old postings might still be good-enough.



To: Snowshoe who wrote (114132)7/21/2024 3:03:14 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217557
 
Re <<brinkmanship>> ... coming up it is possible that the current USA administrators choke off everything semiconductor (machinery, consumables, end products, design tools) from EU / Nato export to China, and China stop all export of legacy semiconductors and rare earths and active medical ingredients.

In such a scenario, Nasdaq goes -80%, and inflation goes whatever, and consolation prizes go US$ 5,000 and US$ 50, but RMB : US$ go 2:1 from current 7:1, because Team China is more self reliant than EU / Nato by wide measure, and have 'uger trading network, and

Taiwan Pacific Ocean frontage hot springs homes go down a lot, especially in gold terms and silver measures

Let us watch.






To: Snowshoe who wrote (114132)7/25/2024 10:00:03 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217557
 
Re <<rename the Chinese noodles in its cafeteria to Freedom noodles! -ggg->>

Following up from circa 2015 Message 30309307
IMO, …
that the boyz and girlz are playing so well together …

I am guessing that the three domains shall improve relations incredibly going through 2026, passing 2032, and all the way to 2042, and then to 2049

Am not sure about EU, UK, Japan, and S Korea, but they should be alright as well as long as stepping aside and watch the big kids play

Everything working about as expected