Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : NRAG-NorAm Gaming-Winning The Battle -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David W. Tucker who wrote (382)	12/23/1997 12:56:00 PM
From: Silicon Trader	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 441

NRAG followers here some more INFO on the Reasons why we feel the VLT's will be of a much greater success. The current lottery terminals that are there require the following things to begin play. The current machines do not have bill accepter on them , so if you want to play you have to go the merhcant ( lets say a bartender) he has to stop what he is working on , walk over to the machine and turn a credit key to initate play . That system does not promote exteneded play nor does do any good for the merchant who has to constantly stop what he or she is doing . Noram's VLT's have a Bill Accepter in them . You simply walk up to the machine , stuff your Boliavar in it and play until you drop. When you are finished adn you have some credits , you would then cash out and get your receipt , the payment was described in my above post Our system is much more friendly to play . Which one would be more likely to get play , the one that has instant access or the one that you have to wait for ( besides being a recorded black and white movie ) its easy to see how our machines will scoop up the players faster then we can get those machines , and elminate the competetion . Which i might add does not have the resources to challange us. This project is a jewel GONRAG MBA Jeff NorAm

To: David W. Tucker who wrote (382)	12/26/1997 3:43:00 PM
From: Robert L. Akers	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 441

>> Should we bother getting involved with it? SI is fine for me. My strong preference is SI over BOBz. It seems like there is a lot less background noise here, the interface is great, everything is archived for a good long while, and the tone of discussion tends to be more level-headed than is the norm on BOBz. I always thought it was a real pain to have to follow NRAG on both threads and was pleased to see David Tucker and Jeff become active here. FYI, I've been an infrequent poster on this thread, but I participate regularly on SI:BNGO.