SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Where the GIT's are going -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Carolyn who wrote (224981)11/12/2015 11:54:54 AM
From: Alan Smithee  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 225578
 
That would be AirTran?

Going back to Rudi's comments about Delta - I've flown Delta a fair amount over the years, most recently in August - They are now flying big jets into Pasco, WA (about 45 miles from me) that connect to SLC and MPS. Both are good options for me to get to Michigan.

My only beef about Delta is how they load the plane - By zones, front to back. Doesn't seem to make much sense to me.

Edit: this might be the explanation for why they do it:


clevelandbrown on Aug 16, 10 at 7:41am

If you board back to front, many of the people in back will drop their carryons somewhere in the front, so when the front passengers board, they will end up stowing their carryons wherever there is an opening, which is often in the back. Deplaning then becomes a circus.




To: Carolyn who wrote (224981)11/12/2015 4:23:31 PM
From: sandintoes  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 225578
 
Trans Air? They aren't any better than Delta. Come to think of it, airlines all have gotten so bad
Nothing like when we worked for the airlines.