SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: longnshort who wrote (900617)11/13/2015 8:31:32 PM
From: 2MAR$  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576346
 
Good ISIL analysis from the Slate, problem is getting all the factions together who hate ISIL but hate each other just as much all centuries old stuff. slate.com

(Glad Bama is hanging back & glad to see we're working with the Kurds, we all knew this will take time)

The new element here is not just the intensity of the airstrikes and the ground offensives, but also their scope. In the past, ISIS has rarely had to fight on more than one front at a time, so its commanders could move units around, depending on where they were needed. Now, to an increasing degree, they’re all engaged in battle, all the time; they can’t fill gaps or refurbish their supply lines as readily as before.

ISIS has drawn much of its strength from the weakness of its foes. If all the nations that fear and loathe ISIS—which is to say, almost all the nations of the Middle East—could band together, they could win in short order. But the problem is that many of them fear and loathe one another still more.