SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Copper Fox -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: louel who wrote (9715)11/26/2015 3:25:57 PM
From: explorationguy3 Recommendations

Recommended By
biggerbob68
louel
Slushie

  Respond to of 10654
 
I don't see any disagreement on the essential points, which are the significant uncertainty on the resource numbers in the inferred classification and the need to spend a lot more money to achieve the next stage of project development. They did drill holes and twinned some historical wells to confirm the historical resource number. Really all that does is justify drilling more wells. Where the money may come from is another matter.



To: louel who wrote (9715)11/26/2015 4:29:02 PM
From: Metacomet3 Recommendations

Recommended By
biggerbob68
louel
Slushie

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10654
 
..doesn't matter what they drill in Arizona

..unless it's water, there will be no mine

..the Rosemont experience means nothing to these fools

you can blow money exploring, but miners understand the need for water, even if Elmer doesn't

...and there is no value for a mine that can't be mined


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News