Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael d kugler who wrote (30018)	12/23/1997 8:32:00 PM
From: Pugs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

I never thought of the SEC as bashing a stock, they're 'investigating' behind closed doors. If you're arrogant or condescending enough to define your 'slamming' as objective 'critque' we can all sit back and enjoy a good laugh! Have you ever complained to the SEC about RMIL, i.e., assets, etc.? Pugs

To: michael d kugler who wrote (30018)	12/23/1997 8:58:00 PM
From: Pugs	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

>>>>>Have you complained to the SEC about bashing a stock in which they have no investment?<<<<<< __________________________________________________________ I've never seen any posts from the SEC other than Starks' announcement of the halt. Isn't it contrary to 15USC Chapter 2A sub.i.77q for a broker to slam stocks on the internet? I don't know if it applies to the SEC, but it would appear to be 'unethical' for them to do that, wouldn't you think? Do you think its' unethical for a broker to do so? I assume that you consider your critque and the SEC's questions regarding RMIL one & the same....Don't you? But when was the last time the SEC was posting on this thread trying to shake shares? _________________________________________________ >>>>>Subject: Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) \| Previous \| Next \| Respond \| You have 1 unread message To: DADDY BIGS (27367 ) From: michael d kugler Sunday, Dec 14 1997 11:13PM EST Reply # of 30027 So if Mork posts a sworn affidavit he is short only the 98,500 shares you'll sell all your stock?<<<<< ____________________________________________________ You'll have to show me those posts Mike, I must've missed them. Since you appear to speak for the SEC, have you ever complained to them about RMIL, i.e., assets, etc.?

To: michael d kugler who wrote (30018)	12/23/1997 9:36:00 PM
From: Michael P. Weber	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Michael, PUGS brought up a very good question. Why are you avoiding it? Have you complained to the SEC about any matters relating to RMIL? While your answering that question please answer another. We're YOU and or YOUR company included in the lawsuit by RMIL? Us stockholder's who have a vested interest in this stock would like you to answer the questions honestly. For months now you have bashed our company relentlessly. You state that you have no investment in this company yet you literally live on this board. It has gone way beyond fascination and to the point of obsession. Mike please answer honestly!