Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (67385)	12/4/2015 8:57:41 AM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86350

Climate scientists say nuclear energy is the answer Greens say we should listen to James Hansen, Kerry Emanuel, Tom Wigley, etc who wrote the Guardian oped piece referenced below. So how come they won't listen to them when they say we need nuclear power? The four scientists say if you're not pro-nuclear power, you're against the world meeting the "climate targets" they've set. What's wrong here? Here's a power source that emits no methane or carbon. But greens aren't really scientific, they're driven by primitive religious urges to wage war against "uncleanness" and to them wind and solar are "clean" (even though they're not really clean) and coal, oil, and nuclear are "unclean." http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/dec/03/nuclear-power-paves-the-only-viable-path-forward-on-climate-change?CMP=share_btn_tw