Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (114622)	12/8/2015 7:05:58 PM
From: Fiscally Conservative	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217791

With Donald Chump in the lead of the Republican ticket it becomes very clear we will have another Democratic candidate in the Whitehouse next election, imo. The Republican Party has shot themselves in both feet, imo.

To: TobagoJack who wrote (114622)	12/8/2015 7:44:15 PM
From: ggersh	Respond to of 217791

Americans will follow the bouncing ball, regardless of whether it's in their interest or not. "(4) he may actually win and could even work out until not if not" But then again hasn't every nation gone down that path? The only friend/godparent material would be Sanders, IMO

To: TobagoJack who wrote (114622)	12/8/2015 9:02:39 PM
From: Elroy Jetson	Respond to of 217791

When a candidate primarily puts forth ideas which they would not have even a remote chance of implementing — it's difficult to predict what they might actually do when faced with the reality of the constrains on governing. Would their Presidency just one failure after another, try for merely watered-down versions of their wild proposals, or would they fall back to different positions entirely? In contrast, a candidate who puts forth primarily ideas which are politically and legally possible makes their future actions, if elected, fairly predictable.

To: TobagoJack who wrote (114622)	12/8/2015 9:23:40 PM
From: Elroy Jetson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217791

Bad news for US Veterans. Veterans, current members of the US military and government workers who have been contaminated by traveling to or being stationed in Syria, Iraq, Iran or Sudan since 2011, will likely soon have to apply for a travel Visa from each country in Europe or Asia the want to see while on vacation or business. Only those with a diplomatic passport will be exempt from this requirement. Americans who have not traveled to or been posted in these nations can continue to travel visa-free to Europe and Asia. The reason is Congress just passed a bill which would require citizens from these 38 nations obtain a Visa at an American Consulate if they have traveled to to Syria, Iraq, Iran or Sudan at any time since 2011. Veterans, current military and government officials of these allied nations who have been contaminated by traveling to these nations can be granted a Visa by the United States Consulate in their home country, but they won't be able to travel without first obtaining that visa.