SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Land Shark who wrote (907186)12/10/2015 11:28:11 AM
From: Sdgla1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576627
 
Benghazi hero’s sis rips Hillary Clinton
Thursday, December 10, 2015

Kate Quigley




Glen Doherty's sister says Hillary Clinton can't deny conversation
Boston Herald



The heartbroken sister of fallen? Benghazi hero Glen Doherty ?delivered her sharpest criticism yet of former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton yesterday, saying the presidential candidate “wasn’t truthful” about the 2012 terrorist attack.

“She knows that she knew what happened that day and she wasn’t truthful,” Kate Quigley said on Boston Herald Radio’s “Morning Meeting” show yesterday. “This is a woman that will do and say anything to get what she wants. I have very little respect for her. I know what she said to me and she can say all day long that she didn’t say it. That’s her cross to bear.”

The fresh outrage thrusts Clinton’s top Bay State backers, U.S. Sen. Edward J. Markey and U.S. Rep. Stephen Lynch — who have worked tirelessly to retrieve Doherty’s wartime benefits for Quigley and her family — into a political pickle as they hit the campaign trail for the Demo­cratic front-runner.

Neither Markey — who filed a bill in Doherty’s honor yesterday — nor Lynch responded to multiple requests for comment about renewed concerns about Clinton’s actions and whether she could have done more to protect the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

A new email indicates that the Pentagon reached out to Clinton’s office to offer military help — an offer that may have prevented?Doherty’s death, as well as the deaths of his CIA co-worker ?Ty Woods, U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens and Foreign Service Information Management Officer Sean Smith.

The news contradicts earlier testimony from former U.S. ?Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, who told lawmakers in 2013 that the lack of early warning and the long distance from the attack prevented a military response.

Kate Quigley praises Markey for 'Glen Doherty' bill, slamsClinton
Markey files 'Glen Doherty' bill to address death benefits In his honor: Bill named for fallen Benghazi hero

“As someone who has suffered so much heartache over the loss of Glen, it is hard to consider ?the possibility that help could have come much sooner,” Quigley said.

“It is another testament to the character of our then-secretary of state and her staff that they continue to deny responsibility.”



To: Land Shark who wrote (907186)12/10/2015 11:31:01 AM
From: Broken_Clock  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576627
 
No wonder Obomber is pushing for ww3…the ACA isn't gonna be much of a "legacy".

Obamacare Is Now on Life Support


By Edward Morrissey4 hours ago


.View photo

Obamacare Is Now on Life Support

Democrats gained the political muscle to push the Affordable Care Act (ACA) through Congress on three basic arguments.

First, they argued that the United States had too many uninsured people, with estimates ranging from 30 million to 45 million.

Second, the rise in costs for health care outstripped inflation, and the market required an intervention that would bend the cost curve downward.

Third, Democrats claimed that insurance companies made too much profit and shorted most consumers on care, while those with generous health plans – so-called “Cadillac plans” – drove up utilization rates and costs for everyone else.

Related: Obamacare’s Bait and Switch Has Left Consumers Scrambling in 2016

The only solution for these ills was a massive government intervention, complete with mandates for all participants in the market, including providers, insurers, and consumers. Once government ran this market, Democrats promised, consumers would see their premiums decrease (by $2500 a year, according to Barack Obama), insurers would gain access to vast numbers of new consumers who couldn’t get insurance before, and the lifting of cost burdens would spark a job-creation surge that would lift the economy.

Such were the promises of ObamaCare five years ago. The reality began looking much different in the fall of 2013, when the first open-enrollment period turned into a disaster. Millions of insurance policies were canceled even though the healthcare exchanges failed to work properly.

In 2014, premiums spiked, and then in 2015 they exploded again along with deductibles so high that many decided not to be insured at all. Over half of Obamacare’s co-ops collapsed this year, most of them this fall, and now the providers who took their clients may end up stuck with the bills.

“Health care providers could get stuck with unpaid bills in a half dozen states where co-op plans have collapsed,” reports Politico Pro’s Paul Demko. “That's because there's no financial backstop in those states if the failed nonprofit startups backed by Obamacare loans run out of money before paying off all of their medical claims.” The failure of the co-op, Health Republic Insurance of New York, left $165 million in unpaid bills, and a survey showed 64 percent of New York providers waiting for payment. Had a private-sector insurer defaulted in a similar manner, these providers would have been compensated from a guaranty fund set up by the industry.

Related: Obamacare Enrollees Are Reeling from High Deductibles

Obamacare co-ops had no such backstop, and more than 600,000 Americans will have to find insurance that is more expensive or do without.

Still, as bad as the news has been over the past five years, the remaining illusions were shattered by the CBO and the White House itself this week. Obamacare didn’t make much of a dent in the uninsured rate, it has forced costs to rise faster than before, and it will kill millions of jobs that otherwise would be created.

“The labor force is projected to be about 2 million full-time-equivalent workers smaller in 2025 under the ACA than it would have been otherwise,” the CBO concludes in the latest analysis of Obamacare’s impact on the economy. Much of the reason – the CBO puts it at 75 percent -- comes from the net increase of effective tax rates on labor, which will incentivize potential workers to stay out of the work force. Democrats claim that this is a feature rather than a bug as people can choose not to work. However, even with that rose-colored glasses view, it means that the rest of the taxpayers will have to subsidize the health care of those who opt out, whether happily or unhappily.

The depressing impact on job growth is not the only illusion shattered, either. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) published a study on Obamacare’s impact on costs and on reducing the numbers of uninsured--and it fails on both counts. The CBO estimated after the passage of Obamacare that the number of uninsured would drop 19 million by 2014 from a 2010 benchmark. Instead, it has only dropped 12.6 million. As Avik Roy points out at Forbes , the 2010 level of uninsured was artificially high due to the impact of the Great Recession. Using 2008 as a benchmark, the number of uninsured has dropped by only 6.7 million.

Related: UnitedHealth CEO: Joining Obamacare Was a ‘Bad Decision’

“In other words,” Roy writes, “all of the disruption, spending, taxation, and premium hikes in Obamacare has only reduced the percentage of U.S. residents without health insurance by 2.7 percent, from 13.9 percent to 11.1 percent: a remarkably small reduction, and far lower than what the law was supposed to achieve.” Furthermore, with enrollment vastly underperforming expectations over the first three years of the system, there will be little room for further improvement.

Finally, the cost curve has indeed been bent, but upwards, and CMS chalks it up to Obamacare. Health care spending rose 5 percent in 2014, well above the rate of inflation, and the fastest it had grown since 2007. Medicaid spending rose 11 percent, thanks to Obamacare’s expansions, but Medicare also rose 5.5 percent and spending in private insurance plans rose 4.4 percent as well. “The return to faster growth,” CMS concluded in its report, “was largely influenced by the coverage expansions of the Affordable Care Act.”

Just wait until they start calculating costs for 2015 and 2016, with the premium spikes and consumers left exposed by escalating deductibles.

So let’s recap. Obamacare has depressed job growth, costs are escalating at a higher rate, barely a dent has been made in the numbers of uninsured, and insurers are either exiting the markets or failing altogether. Under any other circumstances, a program that failed on its promises so badly would have all sides moving quickly to repeal it and work on a replacement. Don’t bet on that outcome from this White House and its dwindling number of Democratic supporters on Capitol Hill. They will surely try to sell us the illusion of competence and success.

That doesn’t mean we have to buy it.



To: Land Shark who wrote (907186)12/10/2015 6:29:33 PM
From: locogringo1 Recommendation

Recommended By
jlallen

  Respond to of 1576627
 
I mean wouldn't a "libtard" automatically be a "moron".

You are actually spending time deciding if you are a moron or a libtard or both? NOPE.NOBODY can make up shit like this. It's priceless. Did people like to spit on you during recess and lunchtime since you are so stupid and sissified?

As for your constant racism accusations, it's been way overdone, dipshit and nobody pays attention to you nor the worthless POS in the White House.