SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sdgla who wrote (907668)12/11/2015 3:05:08 PM
From: Land Shark  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583508
 
For instance, the guy gives the low end (most optimistic prediction) for sea level rise (36 cm). The projections range between that and 180 cm. He makes it sound like its a certainly that it'll hit the low end. Nice luke warm assessment on his part.



I can tell you're easily fooled by lukewarm optimism on his part.



To: Sdgla who wrote (907668)12/11/2015 3:09:41 PM
From: Land Shark  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583508
 
How much is due to nature and how much is due to man is unknown.


This is NOT true. First of all, he doesn't define WTF is "natural". Secondly, the carbon budget in the atmosphere is well known i.e. sources and sinks. The models are accurate and predict very well what the warming extent would be for a given carbon budget. This is a lie on his part.



HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News