SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Land Shark who wrote (908009)12/12/2015 1:50:35 PM
From: Bill4 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
jlallen
locogringo
longnshort

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572098
 
Does Trump scare you? Is he going to bomb your country, or better yet close the border? Or make you pay for a wall? Maybe he'll halt all border crossings and you won't be able to come down here to see what prosperity looks like.



To: Land Shark who wrote (908009)12/12/2015 1:52:21 PM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Respond to of 1572098
 
Another “Random” Black-on-White Murder, This One Of A Six Year Old 8 vdare



To: Land Shark who wrote (908009)12/12/2015 1:53:25 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572098
 
Obama is a pretty good hurdler.

Another official lists technical errors to be corrected, blaming sleep deprivation. The controversial Article 4.4 “shall” is replaced by “should”. Phew, that’s that sorted.

Why all this fuss over one word? Well, “shall” is binding under international law. “Should” is not.

The US has maintained all along that it will not accept legally binding mitigation targets. That is because it would have to get Congress to ratify such a deal. Congress is dominated by Republicans hostile to the whole climate agenda.

Now, the US is arguing “shall” was never supposed to be in there – it’s a typo. That appears to be backed up by Thursday’s draft, which only used “should”.


climatechangenews.com



To: Land Shark who wrote (908009)12/12/2015 4:17:20 PM
From: Metacomet  Respond to of 1572098
 
... I detest ignorant people

..it just seems that so many of them are okies, arkies and texans



To: Land Shark who wrote (908009)12/12/2015 5:04:05 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation

Recommended By
jlallen

  Respond to of 1572098
 
I've heard him say he hates all these folks. I suspect this is only the tip of the iceberg of his hate. He has admitted he won't visit his daughter in her home because she took up with an Arkie, which he described as worse than an Okie, and is having children with him. Hate that deep is disturbing and tragic.



To: Land Shark who wrote (908009)12/12/2015 5:34:48 PM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 1572098
 
Whenever you see that "teabagger" epithet...you know you are dealing with a real moron.