Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Corporate Vision (CVIA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike Boiko who wrote (1320)	12/24/1997 6:59:00 AM
From: D LEE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6654

[post#1] Because these thoughts have been mentioned: wayne j reply 1212 #2. It appears that if CVIA is the corp. which is being acquired...little corp And big corp is acquiring CVIA CVIA Shareholders, We think, are required to get full financial info on Big corp before they vote their consent. But this varies depending on the type of merger etc.! grover reply 1219 is it jyst me or is CVIA over-rated? dusty reply 1235 can you explain to me why any company would want to sell out to a company with a "financial past" for shares that are worth less than a nickle? Somehow, that does not sound like a sound business deal. I would not want to take shares of CVIA for a going and thrieving business. Why would anyone be killing to do so? brad reply 1249 Being part of a growing program with a well organized group could provide long term management, thus continuing the business and providing a long term future brad reply 1253 have always believed that the best leaders bring good people together and let them do what they do best. That is what I think could be happening here. Jack Arnold is bringing people from the right backgrounds together to do what each of them do best. I like it! paul r. birk The companies merging with cvia are doing so to gain access to the capital markets- they want to be public companies and take advantage of all that entails- but I would not expect a profitable company to accept one share of cvia for one share of it's own. brad reply 1257 as long as each new store is increasing profits milk reply 1259? "We expect this merger will come out of the gate profitable as the merging distribution company brings no liabilities to our balance sheet." jr reply 1277 assets of WOTD. Until we know how many assets we are going to be infused with, I do not think the share price will have any reason to increase. dusty reply 1285 If I have the name of this company wrong will someone PLEASE correct me and fast so I can continue my search! This is what I believe to have been in the news release. I have done some tall thinking since they release their "good" news and if you take a real hard look at the FACTS this outfit has told its' investors NOTHING! Nothing that can be varified. WHY??? dexx reply 1292 this might be a bunch of independent tire store owners who chose someone to be the leader and they are wanting to consolidate their companies to increase profits, i.e. more buying power, collective advertising etc. jim armstrong reply 1298 not hard to believe that there are other dealers (not in a retirement position or mood) who are looking for some means to achieve the benefits of higher purchasing volumes. In that light, the CVIA/WOTD story is plausible. (my guess about all this is on the next post) (dave)