Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (908520)	12/14/2015 6:09:12 PM
From: Sdgla	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573073

Ambitious eh rat ? 2030. I'd bet with all the tech being developed in Israel the %'s being discussed shouldn't be any problem. Fortunately you'll be a small mound of carbon by then. These gov predictions will never amount to anything and yet they will manage to do what they always do... piss large amounts of money away with zero return while allowing slimebalms like Al Gore to fly around the world scamming more $$'s from ignorant clowns put into office by pea brains like you. Meanwhile back in the real world Gravity of Clinton's email scandal cannot be ignored Democratic presidential candidate and former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton listens Oct. 22, 2015, while testifying on Capitol Hill before the House Benghazi Committee. (Evan Vucci / AP FIle Photo) Opinion: Should Hillary Clinton be convicted of violating Espionage Act? I first want to affirm Alan Miller's recent letter ("News media assist Democratic Party"). While the liberal media subject each Republican candidate (excluding Donald Trump) to a virtual colonoscopy, recall that President Obama would not release his college transcripts. For Hillary Clinton only an indictment for violating the Espionage Act will derail her. The gravity of the email scandal cannot be ignored. In a corporate environment, the theft or destruction of documents would result in immediate termination of the perpetrator and anyone with knowledge of such behavior. Criminal charges would also be considered. In this case national security is also at stake. L. Gordon Crovitz in The Wall Street Journal related that a Pentagon official said that if his staff could not access her server he would fire them all. Meanwhile Obama told "60 Minutes" he had no security concerns in this matter? Her behavior confirms Ed Klein's revelations in his book, "Blood Feud," that these two hate each other. I believe her effort to hide emails was an act of self-preservation and lack of trust in Obama. Finally her testimony at the Benghazi hearing confirmed that she cooperated in the hoax about an anti-Muslim film. I would call this Obama's first nuclear deal as it was based on mutually assured destruction. Stan Flueso North Whitehall Township