Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (187433)	12/16/2015 11:25:17 AM
From: weatherguru	3 Recommendations Recommended By Investor Clouseau lorne TideGlider Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224733

It's like they are in their own echo chamber jerking off to the heat from El Nino. It is the 3rd strongest on record; it happens. I still can't understand how NASA doesn't even acknowledge satellite temperature data, but all other data from satellites are pristine. That shows this group is more into biased propaganda than science. 99.999%...LOL! Time for a circle jerk! Granted, the media strokes for them, too. Sorry for being crude, but hey, it's symbolically true.

To: jlallen who wrote (187433)	12/16/2015 12:21:26 PM
From: weatherguru	2 Recommendations Recommended By TideGlider tonto Respond to of 224733

As a follow-up, "Almost all of 2015's record heat is due to human activity". It looks like they say 95% in the article. That means the most it can cool down with La Nina is 0.1F (5% of the +2F anomaly...rounding graciously). If it cools down more than 0.1F from the coming La Nina, they'll have to change the data, again, continue to ignore satellites, and cherry pick what they need to cherry pick to keep the agenda alive. I'll keep an eye ;) ECMWF ensemble is liking La Nina flip, and fast.