Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : CCB vs ZEN truth board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: the Chief who wrote (719)	12/19/2015 2:09:49 PM
From: NuclearCrystals	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12350

Chief, if I may weigh into this a little bit. The difference between the development of a Miller PEA and that of the Albany PEA as far as your perception of the timing of one .............. is that there is no difference, meaning according to your perception, both have been impacted by 'delays" for one reason or another. Was your perception reasonable in either case? These developments are always fluid, neither is an exception in that regard, however, much of the perception by you or other Zenyatta investors was built by Zenyatta offering timelines themselves in pressers. Canada Carbon Inc has never published a timeline for completion, hence, your perception came from your own expectation and not of that from a formal company declaration. Bruce Duncan is a very accessible CEO and you obviously avail yourself of that accessibility. Certainly having discussed the project with Duncan may have helped you shape a timeline for a PEA release but the simple fact that there has never been a presser indicating an expectation .............. the door is wide open for assigning a low confidence level in your perception. The fact that you write that you speak to Duncan on occasion does not make your perception any more valid and in fact, it allows for the detractors to be critical of your perceptions and inaccurately compare it to how you shifted your faith in Zenyatta when perceptions were not met. Zenyatta created the perception, full stop. The market reacted to Zenyatta missing on their own calls, full stop. Canada Carbon Inc has done everything possible to make sure investors have as much information possible in front of them through formal disclosure, such that the development of the PEA over however long a period necessary, is reached with investors having full confidence that the inputs would lead to delivery of a very positive PEA outcome. Vastly different from Zenyattas approach to the Albany PEA release. The only people who are bitching at the company or Duncan directly are the ones who don't have the intellect to determine whether all the information released to date and company description of the scope of both the graphite and marble resources dictate that time is not an indicator of a negative result .............. it is actually the opposite. Time is being matched with very positive developments, a marble contract being one, indicative pricing on graphite another and so on. I disagree with your suggestion that the PEA is being delayed to include these things, THEY MUST BE DONE TO ENSURE an Albany like BS report isn't the result . I view the time it is taking to develop the PEA as a clear indicator that the PEA will in fact be unassailable, just as Duncan had stated he was going to ensure. If the company hadn't been disclosing all the reports and data that they have along the way, then I might side with you on the delay characterization as this would have been the exact same approach Zenyatta took, basically neutering investors of any possibility of assessing whether a negative outcome could come of the PEA. Zennanites argue the Albany PEA was positive. Had Zenyatta put out extensive data the likes of which Canada Carbon is doing .............. investors may well have not been in the negative situation the currently find themselves in (they would have understood well in advance that in fact the process wasn't as good as touted and the graphite was posing extensive problems for purification). If a person equates the time it is taking to develop the Miller PEA as the same as the delays to ultimately release the Albany PEA ............... they need to sell because they don't know how to assess the vast amount of data and information Canada Carbon has released in order to provide confidence to its investors that the PEA will not be plagued with the kinds of deficits that the Albany PEA has been. My view ............. "delay" has no reality based place in describing the development time for the Miller PEA. Your perception or expression of a perception is 100% flawed in that regard. Just look at the bullshit debate over who makes up "representatives" of Canada Carbon Inc. If that is the level of critical criteria that the investing public gleaned from the presser ............... it's time to for those people to sell as the information regarding tests completed at four high level labs that assess Nuclear application graphite is completely lost on them. The update was meant to inform investors that testing is completed, full stop. The process is at the data compilation, reporting and peer reviewing stage which is the prelude to certification if the review results in positive conclusions. I suppose the company could have watered it down and simply reported " hey, dip shits, the testing is complete, on to the next step" ................. but then the argument would have been "you talkin to me, you talkin to me .............. am I the dip shit, you talkin to me"