SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Land Shark who wrote (909913)12/22/2015 11:50:59 AM
From: Taro2 Recommendations

Recommended By
jlallen
locogringo

  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1572510
 
As usual you are totally clueless. First of all you have no clue w/r to Dr. Lomborg's expertise: He is a professor in statistics - heavy math stuff - and an expert in the CBA department. FYI, CBA = Cost-benefit Analysis. Next, he is in no way in disagreement with ipcc and equally believe, that nothing done would be wrong. Where he disagree's with ipcc is where to invest the huge funds to compensate for the negative effects of the current warming if any and has long ago - and that's what his books and articles are all about - pointed out, that the benefits of same vast funds invested elsewhere (where? read his book!) would by far surpass the costs of not doing it as per ipcc's ideas.

Lomborg as opposed to what you believe in no way belongs to the usual "Denier" camp.

With your lose hanging engineer courses long ago, you most likely have no idea about the application of CBA either.
I actually did my 2nd Master thesis (for my Master in Banking and Financing) in CBA as applied to the major bridge and airport projects back then in the Southern Scandinavia region.

Took me from my previous technical only level to just a little bit more.

And, as for your tirades about Nils-Axel Mörner, typical liberal BS of the worst kind.
And having all the jungle shouting with you here against this titan in Sea Level Science and more, only proves my point. Sure Mörner is a very unpleasant person speaking up against the greatest hoax ever!
Because he knows his stuff, has all the facts on hand and has published more than 540 peer reviewed papers on this and related subjects.

/Taro