Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Why the markets will continue higher... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (241)	12/24/1997 12:07:00 PM
From: Cage Rattler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 745

GZ: Let me re-state my question - it was a bit vague. In the Elliott scheme, let's agree that there are waves and subsets of waves. These waves, or sets, form a hierarchy ranging from the big Kahuna to the smallest subset ripple. I would like to suggest the possibility that subsets of a wave may have less influence to Andrew's pitchfork interpretation than a pitchfork derived from the SET of which the latter is a subset. Or for that matter, previously completed sets of the same wave series. These are seductive concepts, at least to me, and one you may have considered previously. I want to be sure before tossing it overboard. Seasons best - you are a big help. Ciao, Ted