To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (910100 ) 12/22/2015 9:20:05 AM From: Brumar89 1 RecommendationRecommended By FJB
Respond to of 1587885 Obama Won't Take Out Caliph of ISIS b/c of Collateral Damage Clinton passed up multiple chances to kill Osama bin Ladin. Obama has passed up multiple chances to kill al Baghdadi. What's Obama waiting on? Baghdadi's chance to do his own 911 attack on America? "obvious civilian targets are off limits" December 21, 2015 Daniel Greenfield We could have beheaded the ISIS leadership by now. But we can't do it. Because of collateral damage. If this sounds familiar, it should . Ten hours before the first plane hit the World Trade Center in New York City on September 11, 2001, Bill Clinton allegedly told a group of businessmen in Australia that he had a chance to kill Osama Bin Laden, but passed because it would have meant killing hundreds of innocent civilians. That’s according to never-before-released audio of remarks made public by Australian media on Wednesday. At the event in Melbourne, which took place not long after the end of Clinton’s term in office, the former president was asked about international terrorism. “And I’m just saying, you know, if I were Osama bin Laden — he’s very smart guy, I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about him — and I nearly got him once,” Clinton is heard saying. “I nearly got him. And I could have killed him, but I would have to destroy a little town called Kandahar in Afghanistan and kill 300 innocent women and children, and then I would have been no better than him. And so I didn’t do it.” Now we're getting the same routine from Barack Obama. White House and Pentagon officials have made it clear that obvious civilian targets are off limits — and that attacking them would not only violate international law but undermine the effort to defeat the Islamic State. As the capital of the Islamic State’s self-declared caliphate, Raqqa holds a dense concentration of potential targets: The group’s top leaders work and live in the city, and the bureaucracy they have created to run the self-declared caliphate is based there. There are financial specialists, computer experts, field commanders and as many as 10,000 foot soldiers, and they congregate in dozens of places, including the headquarters buildings. Raqqa’s city hall is Exhibit A in the difficulties in targeting in an urban environment. Even the most advanced and precise missiles and bombs cannot achieve the surgical precision needed to target only militants in the city hall building, American officials said.For months, the United States military has known that the Islamic State uses the city hall in Raqqa, Syria, as an administrative center and a dormitory for scores of fighters . Some American officials even believe that Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the group’s leader, may have been in the building at times. Yet, despite the American air campaign against the Islamic State, the white, three-story building remains standing because it also houses a jail. Its inmates are mainly victims of the extremist group — men caught sneaking a cigarette, women spotted with clothes that reveal even a hint of skin, shop owners who failed to pay their bills — and for American officials, the risk of killing any of them in an airstrike is too high.The same is true of six other nearby buildings, including a mosque and court complex, which, together with city hall, compose the closest thing the Islamic State has to a headquarters. So we can't bomb ISIS leaders until they're well away from civilians or people we think might be civilians or anyone who isn't waving a gun or an ISIS flag at the moment. Which means all ISIS leaders have to do to be immune from US airstrikes is surround themselves with human shields. Obama is actually making human shields mandatory for ISIS. Just like he did for the Taliban. He had US planes buzz ISIS oil tankers and drop leaflets giving them 45 minutes of warning . The leaflets, which fluttered to the ground about 45 minutes before the strikes, simply said: "Get out of your trucks now, and run away from them. Warning: airstrikes are coming. Oil trucks will be destroyed. Get away from your oil trucks immediately. Do not risk your life." "We combine these leaflet drops with very low altitude passes of some of our attack aviation, which sends a very powerful message," the colonel added. The message is, "use more human shields." That's what the Taliban did. But the question is how many innocent people are being murdered, raped and tortured by ISIS during the months and years that Obama refused to act? It's a much higher number than the amount that would be killed in a direct strike on the ISIS leadership. This isn't really about worries over civilian casualties. Bill Clinton didn't want to bomb Kandahar, but he bombed anything he wanted in Yugoslavia, including the Chinese embassy. This is about not offending Muslims. As the last line of the Times story reveals.“We want to kill terrorists, but not in a way that will help new generations of them,” said a senior American military official in Iraq. There we go. If we kill terrorists, we'll just "radicalize" more Muslims. And our main strategy is not to offend Muslims. It's not about the value of human life. It's about appeasement http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/261199/obama-wont-take-out-caliph-isis-bc-collateral-daniel-greenfield