Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (910768)	12/25/2015 1:11:47 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 1587785

more fear mongering from the left, what is it with you people

To: combjelly who wrote (910768)	12/25/2015 1:17:59 PM
From: i-node	1 Recommendation Recommended By Taro Respond to of 1587785

>> So it is very possible to have a record cold temperature when the general trend is upwards, and a record warm temperature when the general trend is colder. Right, which pretty much makes your original comment totally off the wall and irrelevant. Some might say confused. It is not meaningful in the climate change context that we're having an inordinately warm Christmas or that there was a polar vortex before. It is silly. Some would argue that the vortex even has something to do with the warm Christmas. It continues to be a fact that for almost 20 years there has been no sustained measurable warming. The "hiatus" is intact.

To: combjelly who wrote (910768)	12/25/2015 1:29:52 PM
From: Taro	4 Recommendations Recommended By i-node Investor Clouseau locogringo longnshort Respond to of 1587785

Now, with your Warming "Science" so well established and proven way over any doubt through "solid evidence", one must wonder, why on Earth do you guys allow dubious elements among your ranks to feed us naturally sceptic common sense people (in your lingo "Deniers) such obviously bogus stuff through your institutions or at least thru the believers you have in place there? You are constantly establishing yourself and your pseudo science aro that lucrative gold mine of yours called Man Made Global Warming through massive propaganda and a stronghold within the somewhat naive while thoroughly liberal media. You should be the laughing stock of the world, but - just like we, if not Obama - take the ME Muslim driven madness seriously, we just cannot laugh at it as we see it eating into our tax money world wide and other huge funds, which could have been put to work in by investing in real projects. I'll follow your example - and you delivered the argument for that - to refrain from adding another "LOL" here. /Taro Global Warming Hoax: German Scientist Finds Evidence That NASA Manipulated Climate Data Posted on December 2, 2015 by Joshua Krause After examining the climate records of 1,153 weather stations around the world, all dating back to 1881, Professor Friedrich-Karl Ewert has made an interesting discovery. The retired Geoloigst and data computation expert from the University Paderborn has found evidence of climate data tampering between 2010 and 2012, by the Goddard Institute of Space Studies (a division of NASA). When the publicly available data that was archived in 2010 is compared with the data supplied by NASA in 2012, there is a clear difference between the two. The GISS has been retroactively changing past data to make it appear that the planet is warming, especially after the year 1950. In reality, the original data shows that the planet has actually been getting colder throughout the latter half of the 20th century. Overall, 10 different statistical methods have been used to change the climate’s trajectory from cooling to warming. “Using the NASA data from 2010 the surface temperature globally from 1940 until today has fallen by 1.110°C, and since 2000 it has fallen 0.4223°C. … The cooling has hit every continent except for Australia, which warmed by 0.6339°C since 2000. The figures for Europe: From 1940 to 2010, using the data from 2010, there was a cooling of 0.5465°C and a cooling of 0.3739°C since 2000.” The original data shows 4 cooling phases and 3 warming phases since 1881, and we’re currently in a cooling phase. Since the warming cycles occurred before there was any significant rise in CO2 levels, Ewert concluded that“an influence of our CO2 emissions on temperatures can not be seen.” Though his revelation was first announced at a climate conference in 2012, it is only just now reaching the public’s awareness. However, somehow I doubt that the climate cult is going to change its tune anytime soon. Joshua Krause is a reporter, writer and researcher at The Daily Sheeple. He was born and raised in the Bay Area and is a freelance writer and author. You can follow Joshua’s reports at Facebook or on his personal Twitter. Joshua’s website is Strange Danger.