SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (590288)12/30/2015 9:23:16 AM
From: skinowski2 Recommendations

Recommended By
bentway
Condo

  Respond to of 793778
 
When the Saudi Mullahs rose up against the House of Saud in 79 they won because the Saudi troops would not fight them. Sunni's are not going to fight ISIS for the same reason.

I cannot believe we will put regular troops into Syria/Iraq to defeat them. We will have to try with Air/SF and Kurds and it won't work.They fade into the homes there while we try to ID them. Will go on forever, as it has in Afghanistan.

The way I see it, it is a very complicated dance, going on for for many centuries. It seems that the Quran has in it things that appeal to peaceful people, but also things that appeal to militants. The conflict between those segments was always part of Islam. I'm no expert, but - in general terms - that seems to be the case.

The Saudis fought Al Qaeda, and they'll fight ISIS. This is complicated - because ISIS is fighting their common enemy - Shia - who have been recently potentially empowered by being placed on track towards nukes. But, ultimately, the Saudis seem quite happy with their system, and wouldn't want to hand over their comfortable lives to ISIS. Like the Sunni Egyptians are fighting the Sunni extremists in their country.

To follow Trump's example, I think we need a moratorium on ground invasions in the ME - until our leaders can get an efing clue what's going on. In the end, everything will be up to the locals.