Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : CCB vs ZEN truth board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Terry Maloney who wrote (1202)	12/30/2015 8:43:19 AM
From: the Chief	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 12350

I really do apologize, I just accept the fact that the person asking the question is out to get me lol Its terrible but true, I have had 2 years of it, so tend to respond before thinking that the person asking may not be the enemy. I have put up with more then my share in the last 2 years since I sold ZEN. No one wanted to believe me, or for that matter even listen to what I had to say. Now that it has been proven true, it seems they want to rewrite history. I intend on not letting them, they insist I am trying to rewrite history when it came to my ZEN sales. I am equally convinced if Glorieux had half a chance he would rewrite his own. I am here to ensure no one forgets who called it wrong, only to ensure the twisted 14 don't switch in mid stride and pretend they saw the light long ago. Eventually I knew there would be solid evidence that things are not as they seem in Thunderbay. I think the mere fact the CEO would not take a 50% profit on the "in the money options", shows you that putting any money into the play, even for a short while is just too much risk for Allan and Aubrey. Yet.... they seem to think everyone else should take that same risk, that they refused? Karma is a bitch.