Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (911362)	12/30/2015 2:45:58 PM
From: combjelly	Respond to of 1575561

There were a few about it in that time frame. Which is where Time picked it up. But the majority of papers were on warming. There never was a consensus on cooling. journals.ametsoc.org In the 1960s and 1970s there was some concern that increasing aerosols from air pollution was going to dominate the warming due to increasing CO2. So the few who were predicting cooling were not all wet. As it turns out, the effect wasn't as pronounced as they speculated. And they didn't foresee how effective efforts to curb pollution would be. Even then, the predicted cooling was due to human action.