SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Investing in Real Estate - Creative Opportunities -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MoneyPenny who wrote (2523)1/5/2016 12:45:02 PM
From: John Vosilla  Respond to of 2722
 
Thanks. Didn't even know the name but now educated myself. He has been gone 15 years form SI wow time flies. I joined SI late 2004 for some of the more interesting characters on the net at the time discussing that housing bubble.. Obviously those days have long past seems there is no real discussion anywhere on SI except the few on this board..

I wonder who the 28 people recommending this doom and gloom for RE for a generation post from early 2011 were. Bill McBride one of the best as well..


CR, your normalcy bias which has been running pretty strong the past year has finally caught up with you. Housing is not only crashing a second time but the twin effects of a burst credit bubble and peak oil foretold such an outcome. Pretty easily. You have been tagging your posts, however, the past year with the view that the economy was recovering, and that a second leg down in housing would be mild. More broadly, I have noted that you never include the energy component in your outlook except as a small, marginal factor. It's not marginal. My work on California's economy over the past two years, which has looked at the growth in food stamp useage and the effects of high energy prices on a massive auto and highway complex has shown that California has not recovered at all. I'm surprised that you have leaned positive on the US economy, when housing and California remained in such sorry condition. The data on California employment is grim, and the benchmark revisions released Friday were eye-opening. It really does seem to escape you that we are not in a recession but a depression, and I don't know why you're so averse to such terminology. This is a textbook depression, in the sense that its a long cycle debt-deflation. No, it's not the Great Depression. Not yet, at least.

Message 27270825