To: jlallen who wrote (912097 ) 1/4/2016 2:52:25 PM From: 2MAR$ Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573683 Progressive POTUS are more comfortable with exploring sex, get a clue, they love loving more than one lady, to put it correctly. Those who were our greatest founders , the greatest thinkers and our best representatives, beloved for being real. Just how some men are, study history of great men, thats how it goes & defensible. But if you take a real look at divorce today, perjury is common this is what Dale Bumpers had to say :foxnews.com Bumpers spoke of the thousands of divorces he handled as a small-town lawyer in Arkansas: “In all those divorce cases, I would guess that in 80 percent of the contested cases, perjury was committed,” he continued. “And you know what it was about? Sex. Extramarital affairs. But there's a very big difference in perjury about a marital infidelity in a divorce case and perjury about whether I bought the murder weapon or whether I concealed the murder weapon or not. “And to charge somebody with the first and punish them as though it were the second stands … our sense of justice on its head. There's a total lack of proportionality, a total lack of balance in this thing. The charge and the punishment are totally out of sync.” The former senator then spoke of how the Founders debated the Constitution’s impeachment clause for four months. They dropped language from the Constitution that focused on “maladministration” and “malpractice,” before finally settling on “treason, bribery and corruption.” George Mason, who ultimately didn’t sign the Constitution, suggested adding “high crimes and misdemeanors,” which was adopted. “Nobody has suggested that Bill Clinton committed a political crime against the state. So, colleagues, if you honor the Constitution, you must look at the history of the Constitution and how we got to the impeachment clause. And if you do that and you do that honestly according to the oath you took, you cannot. You can censure Bill Clinton. You can hand him over to the prosecutor for him to be prosecuted, But you cannot convict him. And you cannot indulge yourselves the luxury or the right to ignore this history,” Bumpers said. Some thought Bumpers might run for president in 1984 and 1988. He didn’t. But even back then, Bumpers kept an eye on Clinton. In a diary entry from the early 1980s about the Clintons, during the years Bill was the Arkansas governor, Bumpers described him and wife Hillary Clinton as “the most manic obsessed people I have ever known in my life.” And he called the future president “a truly tragic figure.” But over the years, the relationship improved. Bumpers backed Bill Clinton for president from the start. He campaigned for Clinton in New Hampshire in 1992 even as he ran for his final term in the Senate -- against a little-known Baptist minister named Mike Huckabee. “The American people are now and for some time have been asking to be allowed a good night's sleep. They're asking for an end to this nightmare. It is a legitimate request,” Bumpers said in his Senate speech. It takes a two-thirds vote in the Senate to convict the president. Fifty senators voted to convict Clinton on the obstruction of justice charge. Just 45 senators voted to toss him out on the perjury charge. The Senate ultimately rejected the House’s impeachment petitions. Sixty-seven yeas is a high bar to clear in the U.S. Senate. It’s doubtful the upper chamber could have marshaled that many votes on those impeachment articles. But many political observers credit the late Dale Bumpers and his impassioned speech with helping to convince his Senate colleagues to acquit the president of the United States.